!oNSIfazDqEcwhcOjSL:matrix.org

disko

384 Members
disko - declarative disk partitioning - https://github.com/nix-community/disko99 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Mar 2026
@snowflake:calitabby.netsnowflakegonna try that rn20:27:55
6 Mar 2026
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) what are the benefits of zfs over btrfs? I'm curious because for me btrfs with subvolumes and compression just works for my needs08:20:35
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbZfs is actually stable and doesnt randomly fail. Btrfs has a track record of randomly keeling over. Though to be fair, its gotten better and its mostly related to using any of the fancy features of btrfs. Like raid0/1/5/6. Still, zfs is more trustworthy and get more active development. On nixos the fact that its out of tree plays no role as its trivial to install08:39:31
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbI would recommend you go with zfs. I know people that consider data gone if its not on zfs08:40:23
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) I have used btrfs for over 5 years now, with an arch installation for 3 years and btrfs never gave me any issues with just subvolumes and compression enabled. I haven't tried to do any raid/mirroring so yeah08:40:39
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) Tho I did consider doing zfs when I make my nas in the future08:41:25
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbDefinitely go for zfs if you use any raid features, those are just not stable on btrfs. But then once you do, there is no reason to use btrfs anymore.... in my mind its better to have everything formatted uniformly, easier to manage08:42:37
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) well the nas would be on a separate device, my desktop is just fine with btrfs. Tho does zfs support features like subvolumes and compression like btrfs?08:43:38
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbYes08:43:57
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) and once I do go for zfs, will contact you to help me get started, seems like you know your stuff08:44:01
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbBtrfs is a reimplementation of zfs08:44:09
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbIt supports more than btrfs08:44:17
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbBear with me here, thing is, if you have zfs everywhere you dont have to context switch and once you start using some of the fancier features of it like zfs send/recv, encryption, raid or zvols, it makes sense to have everywhere... but you do you ofc08:45:33
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbOfc, message away08:45:41
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) for me a filesystem ( atleast for now ) is just there to keep my files, I don't do anything fancy with it. Tho that will prob change in the future but has been this way for the past 7 years08:46:43
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbGive it time :p08:47:26
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) I just use restic to backup my important files to a separate btrfs 128gb drive ( my backups are like 2gb ) and backblaze b2 bucket08:48:15
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbTbh same, im planning to look into a more zfs native solution, but for now havent08:48:55
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) I might go ahead and reformat my backup drive and my games drive with zfs to test it out, and then move my main nvme to zfs also slowly08:49:37
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) I do think my vps's just use ext4 with lvm 08:49:59
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbIll send you some stuff, formatting as zfs isnt a fire and forget. You gotta make the right choices or youll regret it later08:50:41
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) I also just backup them to a backblaze bucket08:50:46
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbIve got a pretty tuned setup at work, ill share once at a computer. (I just woke up)08:51:05
@focu5:rhakotis.xyzfocu5zfs snapshot and backup to a separate pool off machine is why I have my laptop using zfs even though it's 1 drive and doesn't have the error detection let alone correction08:51:05
@crony:cronyakatsuki.xyzCrony Akatsuki (balkan/slav) sure, tho will prob reformat tomorrow, since I got work in couple hours ( 10 hours shift + hour commute )08:51:19
@focu5:rhakotis.xyzfocu5also zfs encryption08:51:21
@focu5:rhakotis.xyzfocu5it's just nice08:51:22
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbEven on a single disk, you gain checksumming. Ext4 will happily give you corrupted data, zfs wont08:51:53
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbAnd you could still enable data redundancy even on a single disk08:52:05
@magic_rb:matrix.redalder.orgmagic_rbDont use that one personally. I always put zfs on top of LUKS08:52:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10