| 4 Jun 2023 |
 raitobezarius | lovely | 00:13:42 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download image.png | 00:13:43 |
| raitobezarius | samueldr: GRUB2 is marked as "working" on RV64GC but it fails with Zifencei requirement during cross compilation, is that expected? | 02:58:58 |
 samueldr | I couldn't say | 02:59:41 |
| samueldr | I guess you're saying its platforms declaration is bad (which it is imo)
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/90385792c887f63cc473c764f801be7a3f3894b6/pkgs/tools/misc/grub/default.nix#L458
| 03:00:23 |
| samueldr | good luck compiling grub for armv5tel | 03:00:39 |
| raitobezarius | :D :D | 03:02:33 |
| raitobezarius | I will see if I can get native compilation going | 03:02:40 |
| samueldr | that's part of the great debate about what platforms are | 03:02:53 |
| samueldr | it's an overload of two discrete things currently | 03:03:04 |
| samueldr | "what it should work on", and "what it's known to work on in Nixpkgs" | 03:03:15 |
| samueldr | the latter maybe should be "what it should work on" | 03:03:40 |
| raitobezarius | platforms vs. broken | 03:03:42 |
| samueldr | * the latter maybe should be "what it should work on in Nixpkgs" | 03:03:48 |
| raitobezarius | but yes | 03:03:50 |
| samueldr | and both are right, both are wrong, depending on what you do or want | 03:04:11 |
| raitobezarius | [Init] Starting Pixiecore goroutines
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
| 03:06:54 |
| raitobezarius | uboot why don't you want to send proper packets | 03:06:59 |
| raitobezarius | misuzu: I'm looking at your visionfive2's uboot "upstream" which I assume is a tree based on upstream uboot and not upstream vendor uboot? | 03:43:06 |
| raitobezarius | hence why there is no Ethernet on it :-[ | 03:43:11 |
| raitobezarius | it'd be nice if we could customize vendor uboot | 03:43:23 |
| raitobezarius | I need git-pw | 03:58:30 |
| raitobezarius | time to sleep | 03:58:34 |
 misuzu | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
misuzu: I'm looking at your visionfive2's uboot "upstream" which I assume is a tree based on upstream uboot and not upstream vendor uboot? yep | 05:40:14 |
| misuzu | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
did someone figure out netboot for vf2? should probably be the same as on aarch64 (uefi?) | 05:42:02 |
 artemis | anyone messed around with building 32bit pi images on 23.05? running into this http://dpaste.com/2LP59KW45 | 08:10:28 |
| artemis | modprobe: FATAL: Module ahci not found in directory /nix/store/ldvrfh5gcjkawa1v3994axma4sh2n5jp-linux-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf-6.1.21-1.20230405-modules/lib/modules/6.1.21 | 08:10:45 |
| artemis | * modprobe: FATAL: Module ahci not found in directory /nix/store/ldvrfh5gcjkawa1v3994axma4sh2n5jp-linux-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf-6.1.21-1.20230405-modules/lib/modules/6.1.21 (during the build) | 08:10:55 |
| artemis | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
syslinux seems to be x86_64-linux only? yeah so syslinux is x86_64 only but u-boot emulates syslinux is how it works | 08:11:43 |
| artemis | * yeah so syslinux is x86_64 only but u-boot emulates a subset of syslinux is how it works | 08:11:51 |
