!pbdtvoHxUGLhcEvnlu:nixos.org

Exotic Nix Targets

346 Members
109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
2 Aug 2023
@sorear:matrix.orgsorear'll need to do my own backport13:21:49
@sorear:matrix.orgsorear_14 works fine with the existing nixpkgs code, i tested a while ago13:22:12
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @p14:matrix.org

raitobezarius: I've been doing some testing of the above on aarch64-darwin. I found that plain pkgsLLVM.stdenv doesn't build on master, I get a silent failure in compiler-rt. NIX_DEBUG exposes the issue that preConfigure is trying to set CMAKE_LIPO=$(command -v aarch64-apple-darwin-lipo) but this goes straight to the exit/failure handler.

Is pkgsLLVM known (meant?) to work on this platform? Is there a darwin platform it works on?

That's a question for the Darwin folks
13:28:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI have no idea personally13:28:52
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI know that rrbutani has been doing work to support better Darwin13:29:06
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut it's hard to keep track who is working on what13:29:19
@p14:matrix.orgp14Ah, yeah, apols, I was tagging you in part because I saw your name associated with some Darwin things.13:29:36
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI don't do Darwin at all13:30:08
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius(except the basic stuff to avoid breaking it massively)13:31:26
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusOverall, I'd say it's fine to aim for a pkgsLLVM that works on Linux first13:31:59
@p14:matrix.orgp14Cool. Is there anything I can do to improve the chances of landing #246577 in the reasonably short term? (In that I have more time to fix things right now than I will in the future)13:32:11
@p14:matrix.orgp14Thinking aloud: I suppose that once it's working it might also be reasonable to bump llvmPackages to llvmPackages_16, so that pkgsLLVM uses the more recent compiler?13:33:03
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius We are getting into #compilers:nixos.org land but 13:33:25
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius(1) We need to finish the unification work between LLVM14/LLVM15/LLVM16/LLVMgit13:33:40
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius * (1) We need to finish the unification work between LLVM14/LLVM15/LLVM16/LLVMgit (esp for LLVM17 which I believe is in RC now?)13:33:49
@p14:matrix.orgp14Yep, 17rc is out13:33:57
@p14:matrix.orgp14Interesting to hear that there is a unification effort, that's also good to hear.13:34:06
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusso any changes that will bring a new discrepancy will probably be delayed because it will introduce more work for that unification stuff13:34:09
@sorear:matrix.orgsoreariiinteresting13:34:28
@p14:matrix.orgp14Is this effort in a PR or other discussion somewhere? Is there a timeline for it?13:35:15
@p14:matrix.orgp14I may also be interested in helping and testing and whatnot if I get spare bandwidth.13:35:42
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius(2) I think the timing is complicated, if #246577 is the only change you are hoping to land, I can try to take care of it before going into vacations, but, beyond than that, I think most LLVM maintainers are inactive atm (understandably)13:36:22
@p14:matrix.orgp14I think that's a pretty big step forward in terms of the usability of it.13:37:17
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @p14:matrix.org
I may also be interested in helping and testing and whatnot if I get spare bandwidth.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/213033
13:37:19
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (3) pkgsLLVM is probably low priority and too much to chew for me so at some point, you would have to consider stepping in as a maintainer if you want to see continued stability of that package set 13:38:14
@sorear:matrix.orgsorearwould it help if I tested 246577 sooner rather than later?13:53:12
@p14:matrix.orgp14 sorear: it would certainly provide more information to me about how well it functions if you want to try and build some other software with it. Feel free to ping me in DMs here (or comment on the PR) as well with any information you glean, though I can't promise to be of much help. 13:54:08
* @raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius nods13:59:09
@p14:matrix.orgp14
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
(3) pkgsLLVM is probably low priority and too much to chew for me so at some point, you would have to consider stepping in as a maintainer if you want to see continued stability of that package set
On this point I’m happy to try and provide some input and testing; I have the capability to bisect to find issues and may be able to provide a small amount of personal effort to dig into issues to try and keep it working.
15:12:27
3 Aug 2023
@yvtjp:matrix.org@yvtjp:matrix.org changed their profile picture.10:28:14

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6