| 19 May 2025 |
 emily | why? | 15:52:08 |
| emily | if Qt is patching it then it's as good as it is now | 15:52:13 |
| emily | the question is just whether they are | 15:52:16 |
 K900 | Well it's still a really old chromium version | 15:52:58 |
| K900 | Which is not great | 15:53:03 |
| emily | sure. it's not great now either | 15:55:29 |
| emily | Qt 6 WebEngine isn't that great either IIRC | 15:55:37 |
| emily | but not knownVulnerabilities territory imo. if there are no known vulnerabilities and ones that become known are addressed. | 15:56:03 |
| emily | I mean I'd like to see all of Qt 5 gone but last time I looked at qtwebengine users there was still a lot of stuff. | 15:56:27 |
| K900 | Honestly | 15:56:31 |
| emily | for instance, uh, our installer? | 15:56:36 |
| K900 | I'm just looking at the users of qtwebengine5 | 15:56:37 |
| emily | though someone should finish moving that to Qt 6 | 15:56:45 |
| K900 | And I think we might be in actually droppable territory | 15:56:49 |
