| 21 Nov 2023 |
 Lily Foster | how long ago? eval queue looks pretty deep rn | 12:35:28 |
 raitobezarius | I reproduced the failure locally and after enough retries, it passed? | 12:35:28 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
how long ago? eval queue looks pretty deep rn few minutes ago | 12:35:35 |
| raitobezarius | Alright will wait | 12:35:37 |
| Lily Foster | yeah, eval queue has 23 waiting, just give in an hour | 12:36:11 |
 Linux Hackerman | raitobezarius: is the problem maybe the PR title? nixVersions.2_3 isn't an attribute path you can have unquoted iirc, and it's also not the name of the package | 12:36:13 |
| Linux Hackerman | s/name/attrpath/ | 12:36:29 |
| raitobezarius | though the failure here is about a broken Nix store, no? https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285 | 12:36:58 |
| raitobezarius | I don't see any missing attribute name | 12:37:03 |
| Linux Hackerman | that's not eval though | 12:37:18 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Also the lib tests is fucking flakey almost broken? it was actually a test on the nix package: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1611 | 12:37:45 |
| raitobezarius | but wouldn't "Complete, with errors" mean that the evaluation is OK but some of the "evaluation tests" failed? | 12:37:50 |
| Lily Foster | * it was actually a test on the nix package: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1611 | 12:37:52 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
it was actually a test on the nix package: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1611 how do you know if it's nix 2.3, nix 2.13 or nix 2.18 ? | 12:38:17 |
| raitobezarius | given nix 2.18 is still building during failures | 12:38:38 |
| raitobezarius | it's either Nix 2.3 or Nix 2.13 | 12:38:41 |
