| 19 Sep 2022 |
|  delroth joined the room. | 15:09:03 |
 cole-h | The time out change only ever applied to the darwin builders in the first place, whereas these space issues are happening on the linux evaluators (you can check the paths to verify -- if they say /var/lib/ofborg/........../mr-est/ofborg-evaluator-#, it's one of the evaluators). | 15:55:38 |
| cole-h | That said, thanks for all these reports. I'll continue to look into it.
In the future, it would also help me debug by linking to the PR where the issue happened, rather than just the gist. | 15:55:54 |
 superherointj | PR with out of space problem: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/189911
Gist: https://gist.github.com/0abe7b5c758796b597c00f32af756369 | 21:52:55 |
|  pedrohlc joined the room. | 21:53:38 |
|  Rhys joined the room. | 22:25:06 |
| 20 Sep 2022 |
| cole-h | FYI: aarch64 builds will be stalled for a little bit, because the aarch64 box fell over and I'm in the process of troubleshooting / fixing it. | 22:45:40 |
| 21 Sep 2022 |
| cole-h | It's back 🎉 | 00:23:57 |
 Sandro 🐧 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/191189 https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/f0abacf11a345b143fb993ed09d440fe | 09:32:47 |
| 22 Sep 2022 |
 @grahamc:nixos.org | looks like ofborg is a bit unhappy :/ | 17:56:46 |
 Winter (she/her) | grahamc (he/him): are the aarch64-darwin builders setup with any nonstandard configuration? running into a failure that i can't repro on my machine no matter what (sandbox on/off) and am just curious. thanks! | 21:26:42 |
| cole-h | In reply to @winterqt:nixos.dev
grahamc (he/him): are the aarch64-darwin builders setup with any nonstandard configuration? running into a failure that i can't repro on my machine no matter what (sandbox on/off) and am just curious. thanks! https://github.com/ofborg/infrastructure/blob/master/nixops/modules/macos_vm/guest-catalina/darwin-configuration.nix This is the nix-darwin configuration. The M1 builders also have Rosetta enabled. | 22:05:08 |
| Winter (she/her) | thanks | 22:05:29 |
| cole-h | If that looks sane, you can also send me what you're running into and I can attempt to reproduce it manually on one of the boxes
(DM or here, either works fine) | 22:06:15 |
| 23 Sep 2022 |
| Sandro 🐧 | 
Download image.png | 09:30:46 |
| Sandro 🐧 | That is new
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/192456
https://logs.nix.ci/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.192456&attempt_id=6cf55d02-40ff-459f-9bc3-0c4b80a2520e | 09:30:53 |
| 24 Sep 2022 |
|  K900 joined the room. | 12:51:02 |
| K900 | 
Download image.png | 12:51:09 |
| K900 | I might have confused ofborg | 12:51:13 |
| K900 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/192762 | 12:51:21 |
| 30 Sep 2022 |
| pedrohlc left the room. | 10:47:27 |
| 4 Oct 2022 |
 hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/194420 | 16:33:25 |
| hexa | tested parsedmarc and graylog | 16:33:26 |
| hexa | both failed to eval, because unfree | 16:33:31 |
| hexa | ofborg reported success | 16:33:35 |
| hexa | nix exits with 1 when trying to build that, so ofborg should never tell me it succeeded 😄 | 16:34:34 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Can we run ofborg with --check/--rebuild if the attr it is suppoed to build is a FOD? | 16:53:46 |
| Sandro 🐧 | While fixing fonts I noticed that there are many which do not build anymore because the postFetch script is wrong and bit rotted. | 16:54:11 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @sandro:supersandro.de
Can we run ofborg with --check/--rebuild if the attr it is suppoed to build is a FOD? --check fails if the derivation isn't in the store already, but yes this is a good idea
might want to make an issue for it (if one doesn't exist) just so it gets formally tracked? | 18:01:50 |
| Sandro 🐧 | 🤔 could be hard to detect if it comes from cache | 18:20:21 |
