OfBorg | 177 Members | |
| Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD> | 63 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Feb 2023 | ||
Well, there is a ofborg-eval-package-list-no-aliases check, but that indeed doesn't catch it. I'll take a look in a few. | 16:47:40 | |
| 24 Mar 2023 | ||
| There's another case: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/222710#issuecomment-1482486968 | 09:18:44 | |
| The command
doesn't seem suitable for this check. | 09:23:15 | |
| 09:39:31 | ||
In reply to @robert:funklause.deIt only does that because there shouldn't be aliases allowed 🤡 | 09:39:48 | |
| in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/219493 tests on aarch64-linux are shown as successful, but following the link the log is 404 | 12:39:38 | |
| which is funny, since apparently the build doesn't even succeed | 12:41:09 | |
the tests for aarch64-linux were handleTestOn [ "x86_64-linux" ] only | 13:26:28 | |
| 🥁 | 13:26:31 | |
In reply to @hexa:lossy.networkSigh I should really fix that. Iirc it happens when the logs are completely empty... | 13:45:08 | |
| nix also returned early | 13:47:42 | |
| Thats why there is no log | 13:47:54 | |
In reply to @vcunat:matrix.orgDo you happen to know a better invocation for this purpose? I should also fix this 😅 | 13:50:42 | |
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.orgNot off the top of my head. The tarball job also does the check in the same wrong way. I heard nixpkgs-review does blow up, so perhaps it could be a good inspiration. | 13:52:40 | |
| I did happen to conveniently miss sandro's message 😅 OK, will take a look and see what I can do. | 13:53:48 | |
| Oh right, I forgot about the source of the information :-) | 13:55:25 | |
| ? | 13:55:44 | |
| (Your message, that replied to dotlambda saying that nixpkgs-review caught the issue) | 13:56:07 | |
| I forgot that "I heard" it just a bit above in this thread. | 13:56:24 | |
| so, funny story about the aliases thing | 22:27:29 | |
| we haven't been checking them since 1 April 2022 | 22:27:49 | |
| will be fixed by https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/222963 (which includes more context, for interested parties) | 22:28:13 | |
| 25 Mar 2023 | ||
| nice | 15:27:37 | |
| 4 Apr 2023 | ||
| Another alais use not caught: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/218870#issuecomment-1495177322 | 00:38:00 | |
| * Another alias use not caught: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/218870#issuecomment-1495177322 | 00:38:07 | |
| https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/224109 also seems to be in a weird state | 01:54:21 | |
| 01:54:30 | |
*
| 01:54:37 | |
*
https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/36c45d1a59f691c9d8c5c8ad9ba50183 | 01:54:48 | |
| and it doesn't respond to new eval requests | 01:54:54 | |