| 15 Jan 2024 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | https://www.macstadium.com/pricing | 14:11:57 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | maybe 9 months, since they have 2TB drives | 14:13:08 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-studio/24-core-cpu-60-core-gpu-32-core-neural-engine-64gb-memory-1tb | 14:13:10 |
 Lily Foster | damn, i mean we probably could arrange just getting machines. idk if we're paying that price or if we're getting sponsorship from them though | 14:13:32 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | right | 14:13:42 |
| Lily Foster | * damn, i mean we probably could arrange just getting machines if we end up getting a colo for nixos infra. idk if we're paying that price or if we're getting sponsorship from them though | 14:13:48 |
 trofi | Bringing up https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/669 ofborg/src/maintainers.nix: look up files pointed by "pos" attribute here again in case it slipped through the cracks. | 19:49:06 |
| 16 Jan 2024 |
 cole-h | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
thoughts on this @[cole-h]? I don't quite know the intricacies of how the macstadium agreement works, but maybe we could. I'll look into it. One problem is then we're running 2 builds on the same machine (1 aarch64, 1 x86_64), which might continue to make the slowness worse. | 15:07:29 |
| 19 Jan 2024 |
 hexa | domen will know | 01:26:39 |
| 20 Jan 2024 |
 ris_ | still getting an ofborg internal error on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274089 after a rebase | 12:31:57 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org
still getting an ofborg internal error on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274089 after a rebase can you try running the command that it's getting the internal error at? nix-build --arg pkgs 'import ./. {}' ./lib/tests/release.nix? | 14:28:24 |
| ris_ | -> huge rebuild | 14:46:22 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org
-> huge rebuild but not some weird failure? | 14:46:40 |
| Lily Foster | hmmm, @[cole-h] can access the logs to see what exactly happened on the evaluator. otherwise i'll try to replicate myself when i get a chance (my, uh, when-i-have-a-chance list is getting a bit long though....) | 14:47:40 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org
-> huge rebuild i mean your PR is a stdenv rebuild right? so yeah i guess it being a big rebuild may make sense, but it shouldn't be, like, prohibitively huge i don't think | 14:49:35 |
| ris_ | no i think it's mostly bootstrap -> nix | 14:50:36 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org
no i think it's mostly bootstrap -> nix yeah that should be basically it | 14:50:51 |
| ris_ | don't have the build capacity for that right this second | 14:50:52 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org
don't have the build capacity for that right this second understandable. hopefully we can either get logs or i can replicate sometime today | 14:51:16 |
| ris_ | but.. a stdenv-rebuilding PR doesn't cause ofborg to perform that full build does it? | 14:52:28 |
 raphi | i think it does | 15:05:30 |
| raphi | by checking a random rebuild-stdenv-linux pr | 15:05:47 |
| Lily Foster | yeah, it should be rebuilding that | 15:10:10 |
| cole-h | It's just the same "too many statuses on a given context / SHA" error from GH :(
I opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/282387 to simulate another ofborg run that hopefully doesn't run into the same issue | 18:07:34 |
| cole-h | (FWIW, "ofborg-internal-error" label pretty much always means "GitHub sent us an error for something we do in normal operation that prevents further processing", and not "build did something super funky") | 18:10:04 |
 7c6f434c | So, it's basically github-being-flaky label in practice? | 18:22:59 |
| cole-h | Well, I think historically it's more like "GitHub was flaky earlier and now we're paying the price" | 18:26:45 |
| 21 Jan 2024 |
| ris_ | right, problem is it's infinitely recursing into pkgsExtraHardening | 11:10:54 |
| ris_ | aha excluded-toplevel-attrs = { | 11:14:21 |
| ris_ | successful eval! | 12:39:24 |
