| 30 May 2024 |
 Alex | You shouldn't have to specify the location at all if you use -bios default. | 00:02:18 |
 atka | ok, thanks, I'll try that again, was following an old debian guide | 00:02:38 |
| atka | progress, now getting a kernel panic in qemu | 00:09:58 |
| atka | qemu-system-riscv64 -machine 'virt' -cpu 'rv64' -m 1G -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd -drive file=image.qcow2,if=none,id=hd -device virtio-net-device,netdev=net -netdev user,id=net,hostfwd=tcp::2222-:22 -bios default -kernel /home/atka/downloads/riscv/dqib_riscv64-virt/kernel -object rng-random,filename=/dev/urandom,id=rng -device virtio-rng-device,rng=rng -nographic -append "root=LABEL=rootfs console=ttyS0"
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
| 00:14:43 |
| atka | [ 0.794832] /dev/root: Can't open blockdev
[ 0.796131] VFS: Cannot open root device "LABEL=rootfs" or unknown-block(0,0): error -6
[ 0.796344] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
[ 0.796884] List of all bdev filesystems:
[ 0.797249] fuseblk
[ 0.797286]
[ 0.797608] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
[ 0.798226] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.8.9-riscv64 #1 Debian 6.8.9-1
[ 0.798634] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
| 00:21:09 |
| atka | * qemu-system-riscv64 -machine 'virt' -cpu 'rv64' -m 1G -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd -drive file=image.qcow2,if=none,id=hd -device virtio-net-device,netdev=net -netdev user,id=net,hostfwd=tcp::2222-:22 -bios default -kernel /home/atka/downloads/riscv/dqib_riscv64-virt/kernel -object rng-random,filename=/dev/urandom,id=rng -device virtio-rng-device,rng=rng -nographic -append "root=LABEL=rootfs console=ttyS0"
| 00:21:32 |
| atka | looks like I need to replace "root=LABEL=rootfs" with another device | 00:31:54 |
| atka | nevermind, figured it out, I specified my kernel but not initrd | 00:38:02 |
| atka | working now, running debian trixie w/ 6.8.9-riscv64! | 00:39:50 |
| 2 Jun 2024 |
|  Dr. Worm changed their profile picture. | 04:13:45 |
| 4 Jun 2024 |
|  raitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) to raitobezarius. | 11:14:47 |
| 5 Jun 2024 |
|  Kamilla 'ova joined the room. | 19:27:58 |
| 14 Jun 2024 |
|  daniel joined the room. | 07:28:16 |
| 15 Jun 2024 |
| atka | anyone play around with those milk-v duo boards yet? I have a few on the way to tinker with. I know nixos/alpine/debian run on them, plus various RTOS like nuttx. | 03:55:09 |
| 17 Jun 2024 |
|  pie joined the room. | 22:05:19 |
| 18 Jun 2024 |
 hexa | https://deepcomputing.io/a-risc-v-world-first-independently-developed-risc-v-mainboard-for-a-framework-laptop-from-deepcomputing/ | 14:41:11 |
| hexa | https://frame.work/de/en/products/deep-computing-risc-v-mainboard | 14:52:06 |
| hexa | not sure who'll jump on this, since the cores seem to be "ass" | 14:52:29 |
| hexa | but at least in a proper case and such | 14:52:52 |
 Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | Interesting choice given that the SG2380 should release in Q3 of 2024. That is RVA23(-ish) compared to the RV64GC of JH7110. | 14:53:12 |
| Alex | Yes, most of us already have JH7110-based boards.
It's really only practical if you want to do RISC-V hacking on the go. | 14:53:13 |
 @cnx:loang.net | In reply to @thefossguy:matrix.org
Interesting choice given that the SG2380 should release in Q3 of 2024. That is RVA23(-ish) compared to the RV64GC of JH7110. the jh7110 is very well mainlined, but true it's quite weak for a laptop | 15:13:09 |
| pie joined the room. | 15:43:16 |
 fgaz | In reply to @cnx:loang.net
the jh7110 is very well mainlined, but true it's quite weak for a laptop The entire point of the framework is to be able to upgrade it, so I think it makes sense even if it's underpowered | 17:28:04 |
| @cnx:loang.net | yea but with wirth's law it's not suitable for general computing in current year | 17:33:58 |
| @cnx:loang.net | developers have been spoiled with really powerful amd64 compooters, laptops from almost a decade ago are still really usable today and they're much more powerful than the mid-level risc-v soc we've seen so far | 17:37:17 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | In reply to @cnx:loang.net
the jh7110 is very well mainlined, but true it's quite weak for a laptop not that it's weak for a laptop but that it's "profile" (if you can even call it that) is RV64GC which is very basic | 17:44:01 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | while the "real" profiles which will be on servers (yes they're coming soon) will be using RVA23 | 17:44:30 |
 Tristan Ross | What's the difference between RVA23 and RV64GC? | 17:46:35 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | Which has all the fancy extensions and more importantly, platform features like Sv57 | 17:47:06 |
