| 11 Apr 2024 |
|  @shalokshalom:kde.org joined the room. | 20:38:24 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | i really love your icon :D | 20:38:39 |
 maralorn | Thanks! | 20:42:04 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | Is there any downside to using this project by default?
Like, could I mindlessly recommend using it, and it would be fine
Rephrasing my question: Why is this not yet the standard NixOS installation..?
| 23:31:14 |
| 12 Apr 2024 |
| maralorn | Well | 07:59:12 |
| maralorn | It is not a drop in replacement for nix. | 08:00:04 |
| maralorn | It does not support all nix commands. | 08:01:48 |
| maralorn | And tabcompletion is worse. | 08:02:06 |
| maralorn | So making it the standard would be problematic. | 08:02:31 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | i see | 08:03:32 |
| maralorn | * Replacing the nix command by nom is an unsolved problem. | 08:04:07 |
| maralorn | Besides that recommend away it's nearly always the better choice IMO. | 08:05:00 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | Considering those are the only two reasons, I think 'not being able to support all commands' can be solved by simply doing a fallback | 08:14:41 |
