!yxFWYdmeLrdzdoIrcE:maralorn.de

nix-output-monitor

131 Members
https://github.com/maralorn/nix-output-monitor46 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 Jun 2026
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornI will look into it more closely shortly when I fix it.11:28:36
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana) I'm thinking maybe it would be interesting to split the oldstyle tests from the newstyle tests?
Also adding a proper logging mechanism to the test suite can be useful, we can copy the test result to $out, which will help debugging CI tests
11:46:06
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana) * I'm thinking maybe it would be interesting to split the oldstyle tests from the newstyle (json) tests?
Also adding a proper logging mechanism to the test suite can be useful, we can copy the test result to $out, which will help debugging CI tests
11:46:14
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornYou mean having different cabal components for that?11:57:36
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornYes, better logging would improve a lot.12:00:21
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana)Not necessarily, but a way to pass an argument to test only old style and new style, so we separate the execution12:01:13
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana)In CI you can then glance and see which one failed, but I'm not sure how much this is worth the hassle.12:01:32
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornYeah, in theory it would improve the CI to basically forward the test granularity to a matrix of workflow jobs. So that you can see in CI immediately "old-style parsing failed on nix 2.34".12:21:01
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornBut otoh, it’s now only a few clicks to figure out.12:21:13
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana)True, I'll keep things the current way then 12:21:39
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornIf you like to do it, I wouldn’t be exposed.12:22:43
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn* If you like to do it, I wouldn’t be opposed.12:22:48
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornBut I don’t think it’s high priory.12:22:56
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn* But I don’t think it’s high priority.12:22:58
@appleptree:private.coffeeappleptree left the room.12:37:50
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn Primrose (== Léana): I kind of remember that the VM tests took about 10s on your machine. On mine they take at least a minute. Do you have that much more power or do I maybe have something misconfigured? 12:39:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahave you looked at container tests?12:43:00
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornNo12:46:36
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornDo they have an independent nix-store/ nix-daemon?12:46:49
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn * No (at least not me) Primrose (== Léana) is the expert here. 😄 12:47:12
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana)What containers are we talking about?12:47:34
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanixos test containers12:48:00
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaas opposed to nixos test vms12:48:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanspawn12:48:08
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaRedacted or Malformed Event12:48:13
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana)I have never used them, interesting 12:48:13
@k900:0upti.meK900They run a full NixOS12:48:31
@leana8959:faefox.devPrimrose (== Léana)Is that faster or slower 12:48:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Just no kernel12:48:41
@hexa:lossy.networkhexamuch fastrer12:48:45

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9