| 11 Mar 2024 |
 Shalok Shalom | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
The BSD folks have 2 racks in Théo de Raadt basement and build idk 30k packages over many architectures in their cache? My favorite story of the day 😁 | 07:43:35 |
|  dgrig joined the room. | 08:06:22 |
| Shalok Shalom changed their profile picture. | 08:23:19 |
|  Manu [tennox] joined the room. | 09:11:20 |
|  leona joined the room. | 10:04:39 |
|  Ramses 🇵🇸 joined the room. | 10:26:02 |
|  Fritz Otlinghaus joined the room. | 10:30:57 |
 edef | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
Can i ask why you didn't claim more than 5k? And I generally agree with this sentiment. I was hoping that me fighting for my company to donate 10k would cause more companies to do the same the whole reason we have this project going on is that the foundation is underfunded | 17:04:49 |
| edef | like, there are other reasons to improve the storage/infra situation, but the cost reduction would be a pretty minor motivator to do it otherwise | 17:05:37 |
| Shalok Shalom | that does seem to sound like a contradiction? | 17:11:50 |
| edef | in what sense | 17:12:20 |
| Shalok Shalom | do you mean major, and not a minor motivator | 17:12:22 |
| edef | we can't burn like $15k/mo on this | 17:12:27 |
| Shalok Shalom | since if its underfunded, I dont see how it is only a minor motivator | 17:12:43 |
| Shalok Shalom | seems a pretty major one | 17:12:49 |
| edef | "otherwise" | 17:12:54 |
| edef | ie, we are not in the case where it would be minor, but other than the underfunding, it's not exactly a huge number for an org that serves this many people | 17:14:04 |
| Shalok Shalom | my English skills had let me down, thanks for the explanation 🙂 | 17:15:11 |
| edef | np! i do have a habit of using language in a way where a lot hinges on a single word | 17:15:50 |
 Wanja Hentze | agreed, the cost is not large in relation to the value provided. it is large in relation to funding available | 17:15:57 |
| Shalok Shalom | I had a discussion today with K900, about the capabilities that a possible replacement for Hydra would need to provide for us to be valuable. How much do you think does it need to save, in order to come into question for you? | 17:17:33 |
| edef | i think reworking the database / storage backend for Hydra would already provide a lot of value | 17:18:13 |
| Shalok Shalom | It would obviously also provide other benefits, but purely speaking in terms of performance | 17:18:14 |
| edef | right now it's doing an impressive job of wringing the worst possible perf out of postgres | 17:18:34 |
| edef | In reply to @shalokshalom:dendrite.matrix.org
Erlang is popular for its 9 nines :) as much as Joe Armstrong liked to talk about that number, it's not really from a representative sample | 17:19:21 |
| Shalok Shalom | And how complicated would it be, to test such an instance to verify, if the 300k long build queues would be satisfied and such | 17:19:25 |
| edef | i think we can do a lot better wrt build queues and scheduling | 17:19:37 |
| edef | but i'm fearful people want to go for a Big Rewrite | 17:19:50 |
| Shalok Shalom | In reply to @edef1c:matrix.org
as much as Joe Armstrong liked to talk about that number, it's not really from a representative sample I know ;) But its still quite reasonable to assume, 7 nines are common to Erlang | 17:19:59 |
| Shalok Shalom | In reply to @edef1c:matrix.org
but i'm fearful people want to go for a Big Rewrite I would suggest an already written alternative 😬 | 17:20:23 |
