!CcTBuBritXGywOEGWJ:matrix.org

NixOS Binary Cache Self-Hosting

170 Members
About how to host a very large-scale binary cache and more58 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
6 Mar 2024
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien
In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
we own the data, you can transfer it out any time
But because we don’t have our own hardware this is kind of a dream
12:46:14
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.org
In reply to @flokli:matrix.org
We don't talk about destroying it, the plan was to put it into glacier, where we can get it back, it's just not immediately accessible, but much cheaper to store. Until we have a better place to host it long-term.
well that effectively makes it unusuable
12:46:14
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgI feel like there are some really weird requirements coming up, when did we decide we need to own data?12:46:41
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien
In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
well that effectively makes it unusuable
If we save it to glacier we can in the future recover it all at once on another infra ?
12:46:43
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgwe don't own github as well12:46:45
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgthese are some really weird decisions to me12:47:22
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienI'm not talking on behalf of anyone here, these are just my political biases 12:47:49
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgmy political bias is to make Nix succeed, at all cost12:48:08
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgthis is not time nor place to bring our the morals because we all have our own and it's going to be impossible to find a common ground, that's how morals work12:48:55
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienBut I feel that currently we are obligated to delete some data we would not want to delete ideally just because we are not in control of the data. For example if we were, the scenario where we put in in CA storage would be more believable 12:50:10
@whentze:matrix.orgWanja Hentze"it's fine to do everything via cloud" is as much of a moral position as "it's not fine to do everything via cloud"12:50:11
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliI'm just saying we put a lot of effort into figuring out what data is pretty much unused, and to scrape the dataset. While there was a Opencollective open where companies could have sponsored a lot. We had one big contribution, but nothing to keep paying 7k or more a month for a sustained amount of time12:50:27
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliChanging plans 20 times is very tiring12:50:41
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien
In reply to @julienmalka:matrix.org
But I feel that currently we are obligated to delete some data we would not want to delete ideally just because we are not in control of the data. For example if we were, the scenario where we put in in CA storage would be more believable
That's what I mean by "we don't own the data". We have to obey arbitrary rules to do what we want with it
12:50:46
@flokli:matrix.orgflokli I'm not against changing the plan if it makes sense, but I'm not sure all the calculations are done to determine this solution is better, and we're in a position to execute it. 12:51:37
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliI'm pretty much burnt out of this whole matter. We announced an upcoming GC more than a month ago, I didn't see any sponsors step up to pay the bill so we don't have to GC.12:52:23
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgI can do my job and get that funding, but we need to agree first that we have trust established12:52:30
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien
In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
we don't own github as well
well to get the code I can just git clone and some people are actually working towards exporting github PRs/issues history, it's the same question of trying not to be dependent on a vendor
12:52:54
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgI have talked to companies and they are willing to sponsor, it just takes effort to make this thing happen12:53:00
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliIt's not my call on whether we can delay the GC further to evaluate another solution, that's a foundation topic.12:53:11
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliSo please reach out to them, and get them to make that call.12:53:20
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgalright I'll talk to them next week12:53:31
@domenkozar:matrix.org@domenkozar:matrix.orgthanks guys :)12:53:35
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienAnyway, in the short term any solution towards paying less and/or saving historical data is good12:53:59
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienDoesn't prevent us from designing a better long term solution12:54:14
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienAnd supposedly the EU Data act let us export all the data from a provider at any given point12:54:31
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien * And supposedly the EU Data act let us export all the data from a provider at any given point for free12:54:48
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliGetting a sudeen influx of money into the foundation so we don't need to worry about the current costs too much would certainly help. But as I said, we didn't have that much of corporate players chipping in.12:54:48
@flokli:matrix.orgflokli* Getting a sudden influx of money into the foundation so we don't need to worry about the current costs too much would certainly help. But as I said, we didn't have that much of corporate players chipping in.12:54:58
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienWell I imagine that a bit of networking always help12:55:24

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10