| 6 Mar 2024 |
 Jonas Chevalier | one idea, and it might be a bad one, but technically we could add a clause on cache.nixos.org says that it can only be used for non-profit work. We don't enforce it, but that helps going to companies and be like: hey, did you see this clause?
| 18:17:45 |
 edef | hmm. i am not a lawyer, and i have mixed feelings about the idea, but i do think "for non-commercial use" could be a reasonable policy | 18:21:13 |
 raitobezarius | I think those ideas should be left last last last resort IMHO | 18:21:33 |
| raitobezarius | Once engineering is done, minimal operation costs are secured (including human capital), I think the cost of running such a system is marginal | 18:22:07 |
| raitobezarius | Having non commercial use clauses would create weird situations where you like "this package you did for your work in nixpkgs, should it be hydraPlatforms = [];, etc.) | 18:22:37 |
| raitobezarius | * Having non commercial use clauses would create weird situations where you like "this package you did for your work in nixpkgs, should it be hydraPlatforms = [];, etc. | 18:22:39 |
| Jonas Chevalier | yeah it's just an idea. btw, the infra team has been doing a ton of good things lately. my feeling is that we're moving in the right direction overall. | 18:25:10 |
| Jonas Chevalier | but like edef said, there is a lot of old cruft to cleanup | 18:25:34 |
| raitobezarius | i think as i put it now | 18:25:48 |
| raitobezarius | "let the infra cook" | 18:25:50 |
| edef | pretty much, yeah | 18:26:25 |
| edef | we can get places, we just need latitude to operate | 18:26:50 |
| Jonas Chevalier | and treat each other nicely. we all want NixOS to succeed, even if we have different ideas on how to get there. | 18:29:08 |
| edef | i hope i have not been overly inflammatory thus far, but broadly i aim to live by "strong opinions, held lightly" | 18:29:49 |
| Jonas Chevalier | I was thinking of the conversation before :-p | 18:30:35 |
| Jonas Chevalier | * not at all, I was thinking of the conversation before :-p | 18:33:34 |
 Wanja Hentze | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Once engineering is done, minimal operation costs are secured (including human capital), I think the cost of running such a system is marginal has anybody come up with a ballpark estimate for this? | 18:33:42 |
| Wanja Hentze | In reply to @edef1c:matrix.org
i hope i have not been overly inflammatory thus far, but broadly i aim to live by "strong opinions, held lightly" as far as I'm concerned you're 100% fine | 18:33:56 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @whentze:matrix.org
has anybody come up with a ballpark estimate for this? there were costs above for a Ceph cluster on Hetzner | 18:34:38 |
| raitobezarius | There's nothing about human capital because this is hard | 18:34:44 |
| edef | basically, so far "how do we pay for infra" has been the main question | 18:35:03 |
| raitobezarius | I had a spreadsheet for rudimentary TCO for owned hardware | 18:35:04 |
| edef | because being able to pay people was too obviously out-of-budget | 18:35:19 |
| Wanja Hentze | so infra team is all volunteers? :/ | 18:35:59 |
| edef | like if we had a million bucks a year then i'd build you the whole circus and fully staff it | 18:36:15 |
| edef | but we don't and i can't, we just have people with mysterious motivations who show up, and we don't have enough of those to make it particularly easy on them | 18:37:15 |
| edef | and i name that particular number because $1M isn't "real money" in tech startup land but sounds like it to non-businesspeople | 18:39:56 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @whentze:matrix.org
so infra team is all volunteers? :/ always has been | 18:40:23 |
| Jonas Chevalier | we're all volunteers | 18:44:36 |
| Jonas Chevalier | how much do you think it would cost to pay everybody involved, including nixpkgs contributions? | 18:45:05 |
