!DkNkhjPMwKVMKgmGYw:nixos.org

Nix Installer

81 Members
19 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Nov 2025
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92It's like having /run being used for many modern services, except that we don't want to use /run because we would likely have builds that won't fit into memory.12:44:27
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenOkay I see thank you! I will try 25.11pre - starting to make sense now - I think I got my answer 🙏12:45:23
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* Okay I see thank you! I will try 25.11pre - starting to make sense now - I think I got my answer 🙏 (I was looking at 25.05)12:46:50
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* Okay I see thank you! I will try 25.11pre - starting to make sense now - I think I got my answer 🙏 (I was looking at 25.05) -- anyway I will try the other matrix channel next time12:47:41
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen So actually then for older nix, /nix/var/nix/builds/ is not needed then I guess, right? 12:55:50
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen * So actually then for older nix, /nix/var/nix/builds/ is not needed then I guess, right?
(For Fedora EPEL I am targeting < 2.30)
12:56:28
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait does have security implications, I'll suggest reading through https://lix.systems/blog/2025-06-24-lix-cves/12:58:19
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen (Okay indeed nixos-25.11pre has builds/ dir 👍️) 12:58:43
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 Jens Petersen: I would be interested, how it came about that Fedora now started packaging Nix, if you want to tell. 13:32:05
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92It seems like you put quite a bit of effort into it following the upstream nix history for it.13:32:34
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen Mic92: hahaha - well other distros have nix packaged of course - so I think there was a sense we were missing it and also users seem to want to have it available... I had a user repo for a long time, but the /nix was kind of a blocker - but just recently we got an exception to allow use of /nix by nix in fedora.... Coincidently RPM (C version) just turned 30 years recently 😂 13:37:00
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Nix is also not much younger than that.13:37:34
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenBut I am not actually a heavy or experienced nix user - but somehow I stepped because I packaged in a user repo and that was quite popular13:37:39
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* But I am not actually a heavy or experienced nix user - but somehow I stepped up because I packaged in a user repo and that was quite popular13:37:49
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* But I am not actually a heavy or experienced nix user - but somehow I stepped up because I packaged it in a user repo and that was quite popular13:38:39
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Yeah that's always a bit of a challenge with packaging in other distros. Packagers are often not deeply invested, because otherwise they would likely run NixOS.13:39:00
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92* Yeah that's always a bit of a challenge with packaging in other distros. Packagers are often not deeply in the Nix ecosystem, because otherwise they would likely run NixOS.13:39:16
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenI hope it settles down because it has been plenty of work both upstream and downstream13:39:18
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenIndeed13:39:33
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenAt least I think we have better manpages than upstream now haha13:40:11
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92I can potentially also include in security announcements in the future. What is the normal fedora workflow for this?13:40:14
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92* I can potentially also include you in security announcements in the future. What is the normal fedora workflow for this?13:41:18
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenGood question - we kind of have our own security (Red Hat) but it is more focused on RHEL packages of course13:41:19
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen * Good question - we kind of have our own security team (Red Hat) but it is more focused on RHEL packages of course 13:41:30
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen Mic92: but yeah heads-up would be appreciated sure 13:42:21
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Do you have access to infra where you can prepare builds/patches in private in Fedora/13:43:10
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen Mic92: I need to check but not that I am aware of for fedora - I guess we would just hold back up until embargo is lifted 13:44:33
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Okay, with nixos we are in a similar situation.13:45:00
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenOkay right13:45:13
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92what we did so far is using a seperate nix org that we invited people into13:45:14

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9