NixOS + Framework | 225 Members | |
| Discussing NixOS in the context of the Framework laptop | 50 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 10 May 2026 | ||
| yes, i have a single disk. | 16:12:07 | |
| okay, yeah, i'm going to call it strange then | 16:12:22 | |
| My goal is to use Yubikey to decrypt the disk. | 16:12:24 | |
| you can just do that, directly, on the single luks container that is your entire disk (sans your ESP partition if using systemd-boot) | 16:12:50 | |
| i do this on my FW13 | 16:13:07 | |
| i was using ZFS encryption instead of using Luks. | 16:13:19 | |
| no, you're using luks for your keyfile and then using that for zfs | 16:13:53 | |
| based on: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/yubikey-fido2-and-boot-initrd-systemd/60051/18?u=trumee | 16:14:10 | |
| anyway, what i've described is far simpler | 16:15:09 | |
| you are welcome to continue doing what you're doing, of course | 16:15:21 | |
this is what a single luks container containing various partitions (which in this case all happen to be btrfs, but could be a disparate | 16:16:31 | |
*
this is what a single luks container containing various partitions (which in this case all happen to be btrfs, but could be a disparate | 16:16:34 | |
| that is more accurate, my goal was to use native zfs encryption when i set the system up. | 16:16:52 | |
*
this is what a single luks container containing various partitions looks like (which in this case all happen to be btrfs, but could be a disparate | 16:16:54 | |
*
this is what a single luks container containing various partitions looks like (which in this case all happen to be btrfs, but could be a disparate | 16:17:33 | |
| this is what i have currently,
| 16:18:38 | |
| do you see and understand the difference? | 16:20:41 | |
| I have something even more complex (ignore p3 and p4, an old dual boot)
| 16:24:37 | |
| well ignoring partitions 3 and 4, we have basically the same core setup: a single luks container that contains our filesystems | 16:25:31 | |
| this is really more telling, i guess:
| 16:26:23 | |
| (yes they're out of order, out of habit - i guess this dates me) | 16:26:42 | |
| Albert Larsan and i will have similar output here (except for partitions 3 and 4, which we were told to ignore): two partitions for our system | 16:27:21 | |
| one for our ESP, the other that is a single luks container | 16:27:48 | |
| Yep, except that I have LVM between luks and btrfs | 16:28:13 | |
presumably for $REASONS :) | 16:28:24 | |
| (and a huge ESP) | 16:28:28 | |
| advantage of lvm is to modify the partition size in the future? | 16:29:00 | |
| * (and a huge ESP for Lanzaboote and dual-boot) | 16:29:04 | |
| Albert Larsan: p4 is windows? | 16:30:22 | |
| I don’t really remember, might be qubes or kicksecure. | 16:31:23 | |