| 9 Mar 2024 |
 @kyle:iteratee.net | Shouldn't it have the +x bit when it gets copied? | 19:40:45 |
 hexa | fine | 19:40:46 |
| hexa | not with --no-preserve=mode 🙂 | 19:40:56 |
| hexa | u+w recursively is probably the best way | 19:41:04 |
| @kyle:iteratee.net | I used rsync with the chmod instead of copy to solve exactly this problem. | 19:41:56 |
| @kyle:iteratee.net | * I used rsync with the chmod flag instead of copy to solve exactly this problem. | 19:42:09 |
 Lily Foster | rsync -rlE would probably do it too | 19:42:50 |
| Lily Foster | i think | 19:42:53 |
| Lily Foster | idk rsync scares me | 19:42:56 |
| hexa | I think rsync might be overkill 😄 | 19:43:04 |
| @kyle:iteratee.net | But it's a one-liner. | 19:43:26 |
| Lily Foster | nah, we need to make as many packages have rsync as a build-time reverse dep as possible (/s) | 19:43:34 |
| Lily Foster | * nah, we need to make as many packages have rsync as a build-time reverse deps as possible (/s) | 19:44:20 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
nah, we need to make as many packages have rsync as a build-time reverse deps as possible (/s) (for context, iirc the last time an rsync bump erroneously went to master instead of staging was because the PR author didn't expect it to have thousands of reverse deps) | 19:45:02 |
| @kyle:iteratee.net | Once you give up on a one-liner, cp and then chmod has the nice property of being simple and obvious (to a reader) | 19:45:04 |
| hexa | In reply to @kyle:iteratee.net
But it's a one-liner. yeah, but it increases the closure 🙂 | 19:50:08 |
