!NhAsaYbbgmzHtXTPQJ:funklause.de

Nix NodeJS

208 Members
59 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
2 Jun 2023
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusapologies13:41:30
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Okay that's not too bad. I thought netlify was already handled though
(Pretty sure I merged Robert's PR for that)
13:41:36
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswe only have netlify-cli left on master13:41:36
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthen someone forgot to update the generate.sh13:41:50
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterOh maybe I'm misremembering then13:41:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusfor netlify-cli13:41:52
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterOh13:41:57
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterrip13:41:59
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusit will still generate with nodejs-16 for the next upgrade13:41:59
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusbut it's true that we don't have netlify cli with nodejs 16 anymore13:42:10
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusso in fact13:42:11
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusonly codeserver shit is nodejs16 ?13:42:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthis is definitely not worth a rollback13:42:21
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
it will still generate with nodejs-16 for the next upgrade
I didn't notice that in the PR, oops 😅
13:42:25
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusno worries!13:42:29
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswe have the same thing for nodejs-16 actually on some packages13:42:39
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius * we have the same thing for nodejs-14 actually on some packages13:42:42
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterI just commented on the netlify PR13:44:45
@drupol:matrix.org@drupol:matrix.orgI though that would be a game changer, but... It's not.14:40:57
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @drupol:matrix.org
I though that would be a game changer, but... It's not.
Has upstream confirmed they intend to support 18+ soon? You can still use codeserver, it's just gonna be marked insecure. Hydra is even still building it
14:49:19
@drupol:matrix.org@drupol:matrix.orgWhen a derivation requires an insecure dependency, is it also marked insecure ?14:50:31
@drupol:matrix.org@drupol:matrix.org Since openvscode-server and code-server both relies on VSCode, and since VScode doesn't support Node JS 18 yet, ... it's impossible to use Node JS 18 with them. 14:52:24
@drupol:matrix.org@drupol:matrix.org * Since openvscode-server and code-server both inherit the VSCode source code, and since VScode doesn't support Node JS 18 yet, ... it's impossible to use Node JS 18 with them. 14:52:47
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @drupol:matrix.org
When a derivation requires an insecure dependency, is it also marked insecure ?
Not exactly but it won't eval unless insecure packages are allowed
14:52:55
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @drupol:matrix.org
Since openvscode-server and code-server both relies on VSCode, and since VScode doesn't support Node JS 18 yet, ... it's impossible to use Node JS 18 with them.
Yes, you can use nodejs 16 with them?
14:53:04
@drupol:matrix.org@drupol:matrix.orgWe can only use Node JS 16 with them.14:53:17
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterI'm not sure I'm understanding then. Is it not working with 16 right now?14:53:39
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(Happy to help if you're getting problems with it)14:53:50
@drupol:matrix.org@drupol:matrix.orgIt is currently :)14:53:55
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterDid upstream say when they plan to support 18+?14:54:17

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6