!NhAsaYbbgmzHtXTPQJ:funklause.de

Nix NodeJS

209 Members
59 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 Aug 2023
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
But since it's not composable we might as well get rid of libraries
Probably, yeah. Not sure if there's ant downstream users, and admittedly my rough mental plan was to migrate out all applications (at least the ones that matter) over time and then delete the set (and any libraries etc) entirely
14:25:01
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterFeel free to. I know I don't feel like running the script to regen the set after removing libraries 😅14:25:26
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
But since it's not composable we might as well get rid of libraries
(It is actually composable to some extent now, but not in a bit of an antiquated way since we don't truly have our own npm-ish implementation for composing node modules)
14:26:44
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster* (It is actually composable to some extent now, but in a bit of an antiquated way since we don't truly have our own npm-ish implementation for composing node modules)14:26:58
21 Aug 2023
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda This PR removes a huge chunk of useless stuff from nodePackages: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/250592 21:41:16
23 Aug 2023
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaPlease review and merge if you have some spare time. I don't wanna accrue merge conflicts.03:03:06
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Please review and merge if you have some spare time. I don't wanna accrue merge conflicts.
I can do that sometime in the next couple hours. The nodePackages hell-set does tend to accumulate merge conflicts quickly...
11:25:24
24 Aug 2023
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Please review and merge if you have some spare time. I don't wanna accrue merge conflicts.
Merged. And naturally it immediately created a merge conflict with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/250250, but I already left another review comment on that one anyway
00:53:27
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @gdesforges:matrix.org
Lily Foster: I've closed previous PR and pushed a new PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/248107
Apologies for taking a minute there to get back to this, but I left one super minor nit (which tbh doesn't need to be a blocker for merge, so feel free to ask it to just be merged if you'd rather not fix it)
00:54:13
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Merged. And naturally it immediately created a merge conflict with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/250250, but I already left another review comment on that one anyway
(thank you for your recent node work btw dotlambda, you've been fabulous ❤️)
00:55:22
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(I finally got a chance to look at the manpages PR and I saw it was accidentally merged a little early (probably because I didn't get to it in time), but it looks fine to me assuming it passed testing)00:57:42
@gdesforges:matrix.org@gdesforges:matrix.org
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Apologies for taking a minute there to get back to this, but I left one super minor nit (which tbh doesn't need to be a blocker for merge, so feel free to ask it to just be merged if you'd rather not fix it)
thanks a lot! I've applied your change 👍️
07:34:01
@gdesforges:matrix.org@gdesforges:matrix.orgwho should I ask for merge?07:34:08
@gdesforges:matrix.org@gdesforges:matrix.org * who should I ask for a merge?07:34:17
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusme09:35:45
@gdesforges:matrix.org@gdesforges:matrix.org thanks raitobezarius 15:07:25
@gdesforges:matrix.org@gdesforges:matrix.org and ofc thx Lily Foster 15:07:33
@gdesforges:matrix.org@gdesforges:matrix.orgI really use this tool a lot, having it installed via home-manager will make my life easier15:07:58
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster Yep happy we could get it working :)
(I'm just sorry I've been so busy and took what I realized was a few weeks yesterday to get to it...)
15:08:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius thank you Lily Foster for all your efforts 15:09:37
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda Lily Foster: Could you add details to https://github.com/LibreScore/dl-librescore/pull/32#issuecomment-1692558038 ? The Nixpkgs manual has none 23:51:01
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Lily Foster: Could you add details to https://github.com/LibreScore/dl-librescore/pull/32#issuecomment-1692558038 ? The Nixpkgs manual has none
Yeah I'll try to chime in tomorrow, if that's okay. Not sure I have the energy tonight
23:55:38
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaNo worries23:56:36
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaThough if you have a link that would be handy23:56:57
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterThere's not stuff in the manual exactly (because I'm deliquent...), but I can explain what's up with it and what might help us out23:58:03
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterIn the thread23:58:12
27 Aug 2023
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda Should we add --build-from-source to npmInstallFlags by default?
See https://github.com/prebuild/node-gyp-build/blob/master/README.md#usage
Though because of https://github.com/prebuild/node-gyp-build/blob/master/bin.js#L11 the prebuild is used anyway if building from source doesn't work.
02:26:56
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda Maybe we should make node-gyp-build an alias for node-gyp build unless some flag is set. 02:28:12
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Maybe we should make node-gyp-build an alias for node-gyp build unless some flag is set.
Yeah tbh I was considering this option more
13:20:36
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Lily Foster: Could you add details to https://github.com/LibreScore/dl-librescore/pull/32#issuecomment-1692558038 ? The Nixpkgs manual has none
Heck. I forgot about this. I'll try to do that today
13:21:20

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6