!NhAsaYbbgmzHtXTPQJ:funklause.de

Nix NodeJS

204 Members
58 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
4 Dec 2024
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)
In reply to@pyrox:pyrox.dev
should I link the PRs in the cards? or remove the cards and add my PRs as new items in the project?
I've been deleting the cards, adding the PR, then reapplying the same tags, but I don't know if there's a better way
00:57:30
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]yeah that's what I figured I'd do00:57:49
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]I'll update the existing cards in pending to be the PRs instead00:57:59
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]also for completion's sake of what I've been doing, I've added a separate label for yarn-berry packages(non- yarn.lock v1) because those need different fetchDeps tooling than what's in nixpkgs currently, and so can't be packaged cleanly. anything yarn v1 should work well though.01:11:23
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]I think that anything that's a library shouldn't be kept during the nodePackages removal. They're brought in by package managers, and nix shouldn't need to manage them. So I think dropping the tailwindcss plugins and others would be reasonable, as they aren't very easy to consume04:59:54
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]any thoughts?05:04:31
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)
In reply to@pyrox:pyrox.dev
I think that anything that's a library shouldn't be kept during the nodePackages removal. They're brought in by package managers, and nix shouldn't need to manage them. So I think dropping the tailwindcss plugins and others would be reasonable, as they aren't very easy to consume
I remember some sort of discussion or guideline that roughly states this
06:35:11
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]
In reply to @tomodachi94:matrix.org
I remember some sort of discussion or guideline that roughly states this
i figured there was, I just figured I'd let folks here know before I just drop a bunch more packages
06:36:34
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]also I really can't decide what do fo with all of sindresorhus' packages, he doesn't put lockfiles in any of them and I'm really hesitant to vendor a bunch of lockfiles in nixpkgs(what with bundle size concerns and all, one of the reasons I'm trying to help trim nodePackages)06:37:53
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]so we need to find some way to store lockfiles where we can pull them and not hit ifd that's also outside of nixpkgs06:38:27
@wst:imagisphe.re@wst:imagisphe.re left the room.15:21:12
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)
In reply to@pyrox:pyrox.dev
also I really can't decide what do fo with all of sindresorhus' packages, he doesn't put lockfiles in any of them and I'm really hesitant to vendor a bunch of lockfiles in nixpkgs(what with bundle size concerns and all, one of the reasons I'm trying to help trim nodePackages)
Yeah that annoyed me too, there's one of his packages that I especially care about and would repackage if not for the missing lockfile
15:45:29
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)
In reply to@pyrox:pyrox.dev
so we need to find some way to store lockfiles where we can pull them and not hit ifd that's also outside of nixpkgs
Or convince him to include lockfiles 🙃
15:50:01
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]
In reply to @tomodachi94:matrix.org
Or convince him to include lockfiles 🙃
prob won't happen cuz so many packages of his haven't been touched in years 🥴
16:07:36

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6