| 30 Apr 2024 |
 Cobalt | I'll try to make a PR when 20.0.1 gets released. | 21:28:23 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @c0ba1t:matrix.org
It looks like the fix for the upstream issue was merged today. Though, by the comments on the MR, it will likely take a bit until a patch release will be published. So there's no need to hurry here. (well hurry or not, i'm just making clear i don't think anyone from nodejs team will be touching it any time soon) | 21:46:15 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @c0ba1t:matrix.org
I'll try to make a PR when 20.0.1 gets released. i assume you mean 22.0.1, but thank you! | 21:46:36 |
| 1 May 2024 |
|  NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 15:06:24 |
| 2 May 2024 |
|  mac joined the room. | 03:33:06 |
|  TimekillerTK joined the room. | 04:11:49 |
|  Winter joined the room. | 21:02:51 |
| 4 May 2024 |
|  purepani joined the room. | 01:59:39 |
| 5 May 2024 |
| purepani | Hey Lily Foster I was maybe considering looking at the buildYarnPackage PR, and was wondering if you had a short rundown of stuff that needs to be done; I haven't tried looking through it yet, and am not too familiar with nodejs stuff, so it'd good to have a shortlist of tasks | 02:53:20 |
| purepani | maybe i won't be working on it too much though...this being unfixed so far is a bit insane: https://github.com/yarnpkg/berry/issues/6068 | 03:38:29 |
| Winter | welcome to nodejs hell :) | 03:42:18 |
| purepani | how does that bug not make yarn-berry effectively useless to anyone | 03:43:22 |
| purepani | maybe ill just work on pnpm stuff instead since that bug makes yarn-berry lock files not useful to nix... | 04:00:37 |
 Tumble | hello | 15:37:11 |
| Tumble | can i use pnpm with buildNpmPackage? | 15:48:10 |
| Winter | no | 15:57:55 |
| Tumble | In reply to @winter:catgirl.cloud
no if i have a repo with pnpm project and i have anouther repo thats a nixos config flake
could i make the config repo get the other repo and run them in a systemd?
i was thinking of the project repo being a flake that outputs a package or something
and the config repo has it as an input and send it to the nix config wich sets up the service | 16:02:16 |
| Winter | yes, but you'll need to package your project first. there are various pnpm nix things that work, but i can really only vouch for the npm tooling being the most resistant to all of the awful hacks that is the node.js ecosystem. | 16:03:35 |
| Tumble | do i delete the pnpm lock file and turn it into an npm project? | 16:04:14 |
| Winter | if you want | 16:04:42 |
| Tumble | does the npm tooling only work with npm project as opposed to a pnpm project?? | 16:05:22 |
| Winter | correct | 16:05:33 |
| Winter | the npm tooling only works with projects that have an npm lock file | 16:05:47 |
| Tumble | wait, do i have to produce a binary? | 16:13:31 |
| Winter | no | 16:15:26 |
| Winter | the npm tooling will automatically produce a wrapper in $out/bin if your package.json is configured properly | 16:15:45 |
| Tumble | nix build puts everything into result/lib/node_modules/(name)
but nix run tries to run /nix/store/.../bin/(name) which doesnt exist | 17:01:53 |
| Tumble | ok figured it out | 17:19:30 |
| Tumble | i searched github for a repo that has both buildNpmPackage and dontNpmBuild
https://github.com/ALT-F4-LLC/kickstart.nix/tree/f6385349c4dff04e3090559ff553492abd6f7e2d/template/nodejs-backend | 17:20:25 |
| Tumble | and then saw that had a "bin" property in package.json | 17:20:40 |
