| 11 Mar 2026 |
srasu | Hello! I'm trying out packaging out-of-your-element and I'm trying to figure out how to use buildNpmPackage to do so. It seems like doing that doesn't result in me being able to call the various scripts available via npm run <subcommand>, which is the primary way to interact with it. Is there a way to do that with buildNpmPackage? | 01:50:35 |
hexa | none of the scripts looks like a build script | 02:00:15 |
srasu | that's correct, there's no "build", it's just a collection of scripts meant to be run with npm run | 02:01:08 |
srasu | The flow I'm looking for here more or less is to be able to do a nix run .#ooye-setup to call the npm run setup command, use it interactively to produce a file, then use requireFile to provide it to another derivation that will call npm run start | 02:01:28 |
srasu | I don't know if that will be feasible | 02:01:54 |
srasu | I think I figured it out for my case | 02:58:27 |
srasu | I ended up needing to make my own installPhase that copied over the project to the $out and used makeWrapper to make scripts that call node to run the relevant scripts. | 02:59:00 |
srasu | {
lib,
pkgs,
buildNpmPackage,
importNpmLock,
nodejs ? pkgs.nodejs_22,
...
}:
buildNpmPackage (finalAttrs: {
pname = "ooye";
version = "3.4";
src = builtins.fetchGit {
url = https://gitdab.com/cadence/out-of-your-element/;
rev = "c55e6c611585f4c1dbfd8c767e5f872fbeb0c66a";
ref = "v${finalAttrs.version}";
};
npmDepsHash = "";
npmDeps = importNpmLock { npmRoot = finalAttrs.src; };
npmConfigHook = importNpmLock.npmConfigHook;
dontNpmBuild = true;
installPhase = ''
runHook preInstall
mkdir -p $out
mkdir -p $out/bin
cp -R . $out/source
makeWrapper ${nodejs}/bin/node $out/bin/ooye-setup --add-flags $out/source/scripts/setup.js
makeWrapper ${nodejs}/bin/node $out/bin/ooye --add-flags $out/source/start.js
runHook postInstall
'';
npmPackFlags = [ "--ignore-scripts" ];
})
Like this | 02:59:36 |
| benwebb joined the room. | 06:27:08 |
| 14 Mar 2026 |
| amadaluzia -> 4d2.org changed their display name from amadaluzia to amadaluzia[uorg]. | 18:50:18 |
| amadaluzia joined the room. | 19:30:57 |
| amadaluzia -> 4d2.org changed their display name from amadaluzia[uorg] to amadaluzia -> 4d2.org. | 21:22:21 |
| 16 Mar 2026 |
| purepani changed their display name from purepani to purepanid. | 05:55:09 |
| purepani changed their display name from purepanid to purepani. | 05:55:50 |
| 19 Mar 2026 |
| René changed their display name from Rene to René. | 13:43:25 |
| 23 Mar 2026 |
| azban joined the room. | 22:17:24 |
azban | are node binaries supposed to be able to run without having node specified as a package in your environment? | 22:17:48 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | yes | 22:23:50 |
| 24 Mar 2026 |
azban | any idea why that wouldn't be the case with this config? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/51600fecc3d3a57353c4f9cf72a22f1f9efc58ae/pkgs/by-name/ea/eas-cli/package.nix | 00:04:48 |
azban | getting: env: ‘node’: No such file or directory.. Do I need to wrap this to point to the write node? | 00:05:35 |
azban | * getting: env: ‘node’: No such file or directory.. Do I need to wrap this to point to the right node? | 00:05:49 |
azban | that seemed to do it | 00:11:34 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | In reply to @azban:matrix.org any idea why that wouldn't be the case with this config? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/51600fecc3d3a57353c4f9cf72a22f1f9efc58ae/pkgs/by-name/ea/eas-cli/package.nix the file that gets symlinked as $out/bin/eas in postFixup doesn't have its shebang fixed with patchShebangs since patchShebangsHook runs in fixupPhase which is right before the code in postFixup runs | 02:44:51 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | and so it doesnt have a correct shebang that would point to a nodejs already | 02:45:08 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | and having the proper shebang would register the correct nodejs as a dependency and then you wouldn't have to wrap it | 02:45:31 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | so tl;dr the packaging is slightly wrong and then it doesnt work properly | 02:47:01 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | hmm, why doesn't nodeJsInstallExecutables link to nodejs-slim instead of nodejs? Not installing corepack and npm with everything could save a few dozen mb everywhere, which I think would be a good tradeoff. | 16:15:16 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | * hmm, why doesn't nodeJsInstallExecutables link to nodejs-slim instead of nodejs? Not installing corepack and npm with everything could save a few dozen mb everywhere, which I think would be a good space saving | 16:15:25 |
| 25 Mar 2026 |
| raboof joined the room. | 10:26:35 |
raboof | I'm surprised not more people have been hit by nodejs.src disappearing (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/501357) | 10:27:32 |