| 2 Oct 2025 |
 dish [Fox/It/She] | still does, its a pain to fix merge conflicts when i have multiple PRs in flight against it 🥴 | 14:55:59 |
 Sandro 🐧 | The best way out of that is to extract the packages from it | 14:57:11 |
| Sandro 🐧 | * The best way out of that is to extract the packages from it you care about | 14:57:16 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | yeah that's what I'm doing | 14:57:18 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | but its a pain even when doing that for multiple packages in parallel | 14:57:29 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Just removing the package should no require a regen and have little conflicts | 14:57:43 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | oh gods i never regen the set | 14:59:45 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | that's never gonna happen if i can help it | 15:00:04 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | anything useful can be extracted from it and anything useless gets dropped | 15:00:16 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | might make a mega-PR removing all packages from nodePackages that are currently unpackagable due to not having upstream lockfiles | 15:01:05 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | * might make a mega-PR removing all packages from nodePackages that are currently unpackagable in normal nixpkgs expressions due to not having upstream lockfiles | 15:01:51 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | welp here i go down that rabbit hole lol | 15:50:14 |
|  @vengmark2:matrix.org left the room. | 17:42:10 |
| 4 Oct 2025 |
|  @aidalgol:tchncs.de left the room. | 00:51:26 |
| 5 Oct 2025 |
|  @rosssmyth:matrix.org left the room. | 01:47:38 |
| 7 Oct 2025 |
 Emma [it/its] | question: how do i override the build command with buildNpmPackage? | 13:46:53 |
| Emma [it/its] | nvm, npmBuildScript lol | 13:47:33 |
| 9 Oct 2025 |
|  @eveeifyeve:matrix.org joined the room. | 02:58:25 |
| @eveeifyeve:matrix.org | CC Winter & Lily Foster: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/317927#issuecomment-3383799636 | 02:58:55 |
 Winter | you don’t have to ping us here too, i assure you we read GitHub notifs | 03:00:16 |
| @eveeifyeve:matrix.org | I only did it because tomberek advised me in the unofficial nix discord to do so. | 07:40:50 |
| @eveeifyeve:matrix.org | * I only did it because tomberek advised me in the unofficial nix discord to do so. Incase you miss your notfications. | 07:41:22 |
| @eveeifyeve:matrix.org | * I only did it because tomberek advised me in the unofficial nix discord to do so. In case you miss your notifications. | 07:41:36 |
| 11 Oct 2025 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | https://github.com/orgs/pnpm/discussions/8602 😔 | 03:13:29 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | the js ecosystem makes me so sad | 03:15:50 |
 Cobalt | Well, someone motivated could figure out how to bootstrap it from earlier versions.
My guess is that a chain of at most three will work. Don't GCC and friends also need that? It's a bit overkill for a package manager though | 03:22:28 |
| Cobalt | * | 03:23:55 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | every version with a lockfile has used pnpm lockfiles | 03:27:13 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | and they have changed their lockfile schema a lot so you would need a lot of intermediate versions to bootstrap from somewhere with no lockfile | 03:27:36 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | the last version with no lockfile is v0.64.2 from 2017, and the next release(0.64.3) uses a shrinkwrap.yaml file, which is the precursor to pnpm-lock.yaml | 03:28:46 |
