Nix NodeJS - Public Room Timeline

	Nix NodeJS	194 Members
		56 Servers

Load older messages

Sender	Message	Time
30 Apr 2024
matejam	Maybe I'm wrong about nodejs_18, but I'm quite sure I saw it in the logs at some point. Anyway, in my previous fixed-point derivation I had to update my package-lock.json and with fetchNpmDeps I didn't have to do that which I really like 😄	20:37:20
matejam	I think that project used nodejs_16 but I'm okay with changing the version	20:38:15
Lily Foster	i mean you can just use the `nodejs` attr which should always be latest LTS	20:44:07
Lily Foster	unless it has C++ code in which case, nodejs breaks that a little between versions and you may want to pin one	20:44:28
Lily Foster	(fwiw current LTS is nodejs_22 as of a few days ago)	20:45:20
Lily Foster	(apparently)	20:45:26
matejam	Here's a working version: https://github.com/MatejaMaric/yota-laravel/blob/c114ebc3c725a67a19d148a95543ed307094c659/derivation.nix Thanks a lot Lily! 🤗	20:45:42
Lily Foster	oh heck yeah, that's awesome :)	20:45:58
matejam	unless it has C++ code in which case, nodejs breaks that a little between versions and you may want to pin one Yeah, I'll pin it. I had to add `NODE_OPTIONS="--openssl-legacy-provider";` for SSL to work so I guess I do use C++	20:46:28
Lily Foster	In reply to @matejam:matrix.org Here's a working version: https://github.com/MatejaMaric/yota-laravel/blob/c114ebc3c725a67a19d148a95543ed307094c659/derivation.nix Thanks a lot Lily! 🤗 (if you want, you can set `npmBuildScript = "prod"` and include `npmBuildHook` as well)	20:46:36
Lily Foster	In reply to @matejam:matrix.org Here's a working version: https://github.com/MatejaMaric/yota-laravel/blob/c114ebc3c725a67a19d148a95543ed307094c659/derivation.nix Thanks a lot Lily! 🤗 * (if you want, you can set `npmBuildScript = "prod"` and include `npmBuildHook` as well and remove the `postBuild`)	20:46:41
Cobalt	Iirc, the nodejs 22 LTS has some problems with node gyp. You might want to stick with 18 for a few more weeks until testing has been done	20:46:49
Lily Foster	In reply to @c0ba1t:matrix.org Iirc, the nodejs 22 LTS has some problems with node gyp. You might want to stick with 18 for a few more weeks until testing has been done well if they're using `npmHooks` and `nodejs`, it'll be 20 for a bit	20:47:13
Lily Foster	i don't think nixpkgs has set `nodejs = nodejs_22` yet (just `node_20`)	20:47:27
Lily Foster	In reply to @c0ba1t:matrix.org Iirc, the nodejs 22 LTS has some problems with node gyp. You might want to stick with 18 for a few more weeks until testing has been done (also what problems? that's concerning if their build tool didn't work on release....)	20:47:44
Lily Foster	(~~i guess it is nodejs admittedly~~)	20:47:54
matejam	(if you want, you can set npmBuildScript = "prod" and include npmBuildHook as well and remove the postBuild) Hm, for some reason if I do that it doesn't generate files that `npm run prod` generates in `$src/share/php/yota-laravel/public/` where I want them.	20:56:46
Cobalt	Iirc, it is on 22 on unstable. I don't remember the specifics but an unstable bum recently made our builds fail until we returned to 18. Iirc, it was similar to https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues/3029	20:59:57
Lily Foster	In reply to @matejam:matrix.org (if you want, you can set npmBuildScript = "prod" and include npmBuildHook as well and remove the postBuild) Hm, for some reason if I do that it doesn't generate files that `npm run prod` generates in `$src/share/php/yota-laravel/public/` where I want them. share derivation? (e.g. on a pastebin?) that seems weird	21:00:53
Lily Foster	oh you know what	21:01:00
Lily Foster	In reply to @c0ba1t:matrix.org Iirc, it is on 22 on unstable. I don't remember the specifics but an unstable bum recently made our builds fail until we returned to 18. Iirc, it was similar to https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues/3029 but it was 20 before 22, did 20 not work either?	21:01:19
Lily Foster	In reply to @lily:lily.flowers oh you know what i wonder if it's because the composer stuff changes build to that dir first	21:02:06
Lily Foster	if it's working now, leave it as-is then :)	21:02:13
matejam	i wonder if it's because the composer stuff changes build to that dir first Yeah, maybe even the other way around. In the logs I see first the npm runs and then composer> if it's working now, leave it as-is then :) sure 😄 share derivation? (e.g. on a pastebin?) that seems weird If you are interested, I can make a new branch with the change. It's my open source project anyway	21:04:59
matejam	* i wonder if it's because the composer stuff changes build to that dir first Yeah, maybe even the other way around. In the logs I see first the npm runs and then composer. if it's working now, leave it as-is then :) sure 😄 share derivation? (e.g. on a pastebin?) that seems weird If you are interested, I can make a new branch with the change. It's my open source project anyway	21:05:17
Lily Foster	In reply to @matejam:matrix.org i wonder if it's because the composer stuff changes build to that dir first Yeah, maybe even the other way around. In the logs I see first the npm runs and then composer. if it's working now, leave it as-is then :) sure 😄 share derivation? (e.g. on a pastebin?) that seems weird If you are interested, I can make a new branch with the change. It's my open source project anyway nah, i'm pretty sure it's because composer changes dir and you want npm to run after that. so you're doing it right enough and this looks pretty awesome actually :)	21:05:34
Lily Foster	it feels neat that you are able to mix the npm hooks into another builder without too much fuss and have a multi-language-package-manager app build in a derivation like that	21:06:10
Lily Foster	In reply to @c0ba1t:matrix.org Iirc, it is on 22 on unstable. I don't remember the specifics but an unstable bum recently made our builds fail until we returned to 18. Iirc, it was similar to https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/issues/3029 oooof. well marsam left and i'm recovering from surgery, so someone else will probably have to bump the nodejs derivation	21:09:32
Lily Foster	In reply to @lily:lily.flowers oooof. well marsam left and i'm recovering from surgery, so someone else will probably have to bump the nodejs derivation (no one else is on nodejs team rn except winter who also hasn't had time for things....)	21:10:15
matejam	Yeah, Composer also has it's own version of `fetchNpmDeps` (`mkComposerRepository`) but I couldn't really make it work. I don't know how it would handle 3 or more language app builds 😂 I'm glad that it works for 2	21:10:14

Show newer messages

Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6