!NhAsaYbbgmzHtXTPQJ:funklause.de

Nix NodeJS

206 Members
59 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Jul 2023
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjan but yarnLock = "${src}/yarn.lock"; would still be a problem, no?
so I need to take yarn.lock and add it to nixpkgs ?
03:11:17
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjangoing to sleep now ... see ya tomorrow03:13:06
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanthat's this change https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc/pull/175803:13:59
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @gdamjan:spodeli.org
but yarnLock = "${src}/yarn.lock"; would still be a problem, no?
so I need to take yarn.lock and add it to nixpkgs ?
Not for fetchYarnDeps because it doesn't use the path at eval time (no import or read or anything), it's only used build time
03:15:17
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @gdamjan:spodeli.org
going to sleep now ... see ya tomorrow
Rest well 💤
03:15:43
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda

How can I figure out which dependency causes

thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'non-git dependencies should have assosciated integrity', src/parse/mod.rs:142:22

in https://github.com/karma-runner/karma ?

05:02:43
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda *

How can I figure out which dependency causes

thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'non-git dependencies should have assosciated integrity', src/parse/mod.rs:142:22

when packaging https://github.com/karma-runner/karma using buildNpmPackage?

05:05:29
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda

turns out it's due to this line in package.json:

{
  "devDependencies": {
    "karma": "."
  }
}
06:04:42
@h7x4:nani.wtfh7x4 joined the room.08:30:48
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de

turns out it's due to this line in package.json:

{
  "devDependencies": {
    "karma": "."
  }
}
Oh hmm, I can probably make that work if npm allows that, but does npm really allow using a package as a dev dependency of itself?
10:50:19
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjannpm - everything goes10:50:55
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanwhat's even the point of that10:51:12
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @gdamjan:spodeli.org
what's even the point of that
I think given it's a test runner that it's probably to allow them to run their own tests with itself
10:53:22
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterBut I imagine that would really only work when there are no lifecycle scripts that need to run to build the package (e.g. to run typescript compiler or something)10:54:27
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(Still surprised it allows it at all though)10:54:40
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjan Lily Foster: executive decision time. stdenv.mkDerivation https://gist.github.com/gdamjan/08901abe49baadf083034e93ed32ccbe#file-default-2-nix
or try to hack around with mkYarnPackage and try to make https://gist.github.com/gdamjan/08901abe49baadf083034e93ed32ccbe#file-default-nix work ?
12:23:33
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @gdamjan:spodeli.org
Lily Foster: executive decision time. stdenv.mkDerivation https://gist.github.com/gdamjan/08901abe49baadf083034e93ed32ccbe#file-default-2-nix
or try to hack around with mkYarnPackage and try to make https://gist.github.com/gdamjan/08901abe49baadf083034e93ed32ccbe#file-default-nix work ?
Why do you have to set the yarn config twice here? https://gist.github.com/gdamjan/08901abe49baadf083034e93ed32ccbe#file-default-2-nix-L71
12:25:08
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster Also if you can use fixup-yarn-lock from prefetch-yarn-deps rather than fixup_yarn_lock from yarn2nix https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/240174 12:26:06
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanI don't know, but the yarn --production pruning tried to download without that (and failed because of the --ofline) 12:26:11
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanI'm guessing themktemp HOME was removed between the phases?12:27:01
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjan * I'm guessing the mktemp HOME was removed between the phases?12:27:08
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @gdamjan:spodeli.org
I'm guessing the mktemp HOME was removed between the phases?
Oh yeah it's because of this https://gist.github.com/gdamjan/08901abe49baadf083034e93ed32ccbe#file-default-2-nix-L58
12:27:27
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterIs that necessary?12:27:33
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjan
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Is that necessary?
I've seen it used in nixpkgs, but let's check
12:28:04
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanbut afaik HOME is where yarn config stores the config, and without it, nix sets HOME to a non-existent directory, doesn't it?12:29:25
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterNo i mean why set home twice?12:30:16
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterIt should just be needed once12:30:20
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanI thought it was a different shell instance12:31:18
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterNo all phases are evaluated in the same bash instance in stdenv12:32:05
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanlet me see12:32:09

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6