| 30 Sep 2025 |
Charles | * my understanding is that builders in nixpkgs don't really care about granularity like this in general because in nixpkgs' case it often would need to rebuild everything anyway | 00:14:06 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | there's that yes | 00:15:22 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | ideally with CA derivations we could just download the package once and be done with it | 00:15:37 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | but CA derivations are far-term to never at this point so | 00:15:48 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | with CA derivations that kind of granularity would actually be a good idea to have, since they could more easily be de-duplicated and re-used even if npm/node versions changed | 00:16:37 |
dish [Fox/It/She] | * with CA derivations that kind of granularity would actually be a good thing to have, since they could more easily be de-duplicated and re-used even if npm/node versions changed | 00:16:42 |