| 13 Sep 2023 |
 hexa | In reply to @ajs124:ajs124.de
yup. firefox-esr-115 is also broken on release-23.05. should I open a revert or does one of you want to? was already confirmed here | 13:54:39 |
| hexa | In reply to @ajs124:ajs124.de
I think maybe f81059c16b16d9826ef7fd0ecc23bf3d0888f859?
does that affect thunderbird? revert this for now | 13:54:45 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/254960 | 13:56:24 |
 vcunat | Maybe we should use fixed attribute names like nss_3_79. | 13:56:35 |
| vcunat | Or nss_for_115 :-) | 13:56:48 |
| vcunat | * Or nss_for_esr_115 :-) | 13:57:05 |
| hexa | yeah, and then we keep nss for the general public | 13:57:07 |
| hexa | and can use _latest and the explicit versions | 13:57:27 |
 ajs124 | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
yeah, and then we keep nss for the general public we already have that right now, no? it just points to nss_esr. | 13:57:41 |
| hexa | yes | 13:59:27 |
| hexa | the point was about pinning the ESR release of thunderbird and firefox to the specific version by number | 13:59:56 |
| hexa | because that will always be the correct version and not an alias for some version | 14:00:15 |
| vcunat | Another ESR won't come until next summer, so it's no big deal really. | 14:03:19 |
| ajs124 | makes sense. can we maybe not expose those "globally"? otherwise we'll have to add aliases etc, every time we switch an esr release. | 14:03:25 |
| hexa | firefox 115 esr reached profiling | 14:47:57 |
| vcunat | TB 115 built for me again. | 14:55:58 |
| hexa | good to go then? | 14:57:53 |
| hexa | waiting for eval is probably unnecesary | 14:58:15 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/254976 | 15:57:00 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/255036 | 23:42:49 |
| hexa | busy day | 23:42:55 |
| 16 Sep 2023 |
 Artturin | nbp: take a look https://github.com/mozilla/nixpkgs-mozilla/pull/309 | 03:52:09 |
| Artturin | * nbp: please take a look https://github.com/mozilla/nixpkgs-mozilla/pull/309 | 03:52:20 |
| hexa | vcunat: I assume you want to stay with sha512 as well? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/255512/commits/bbd4ae85e3570324c7c1475bcf85267ddd0b4f88#diff-c31c9c46667258c9a9cce5227f5913537894a3e1a85fe877e9e3c56ea6e1e171 | 18:23:46 |
| vcunat | It's generated by the updater. | 18:24:51 |
| vcunat | I suspect it's simpler to reuse the format that upstream publishes. | 18:25:17 |
| hexa | if that is the same updater as for firefox, well | 18:25:20 |
| hexa | also it's not tofu that way | 18:25:27 |
| vcunat | The updater could convert it e.g. by calling nix hash but why not just use it as it is? | 18:26:07 |
| hexa | ask the PR author 😄 | 18:26:47 |
