| 20 Sep 2023 |
 K900 | Also I'm pretty sure we don't need this anymore? | 11:42:52 |
 nbp | but I am not sure if this will last… | 11:42:56 |
| K900 | Since it's disabled via policies | 11:42:58 |
| nbp | We still need this, as otherwise it will display an annoying message everyday. | 11:43:21 |
| nbp | I guess this can be tested on nightly by waiting 12h. | 11:44:10 |
| K900 | It sets DisableAppUpdate = true; | 11:45:42 |
| K900 | In policies.json | 11:45:45 |
| K900 | Which I think does the same thing? | 11:45:51 |
| nbp | probably. | 11:45:59 |
| K900 | Wrote up a full repro case: https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/520 | 12:08:03 |
| K900 | @nbp how hard would it be to make a build that's exactly like an official nightly build, but without the relrhack? | 12:10:23 |
| K900 | Is there like a Docker container or something? | 12:10:34 |
| nbp | using Mozilla infra, I suppose this might be easy as soon as you tell me which flags should be set/removed. | 12:11:13 |
| K900 | Just reverting https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/032b87ff55061bcbdc7a85d9e18fde814797073a | 12:11:41 |
| nbp | I can try to push that to our try server. | 12:12:24 |
| nbp | but from what I understand that would use elfhack instead. | 12:12:48 |
| K900 | Well whatever it was using before worked | 12:14:01 |
| K900 | I mostly just want to make sure this is actually the commit that's causing the regression | 12:14:15 |
| K900 | And the only way I can think of doing that is to build with it reverted and see what happens | 12:14:25 |
| K900 | And I don't want to spend an hour waiting for it to build with nixpkgs tools just to find out it was never broken in nixpkgs to begin with | 12:17:25 |
| nbp | a tarball would be enough? | 12:17:28 |
| K900 | For the build artifacts? Yeah | 12:19:54 |
| K900 | Any .so file should be enough by itself it seems | 12:20:13 |
| nbp | estimates: Should take about 1:15:59 (Finished around 2023-09-20 06:40) | 12:25:08 |
| nbp | (assuming the try server answers) | 12:26:13 |
| K900 | Oh | 12:33:02 |
| K900 | I just realized what you're doing lol | 12:33:05 |
| K900 | Thanks :) | 12:33:07 |
 colemickens | I can revert the updates until it gets to a working build and merge the test PR. I'm torn between wanting to understand why the audio tests were broken or just leaving the test PR as-is and accepting it. | 13:15:51 |
| colemickens | I also feel like it might be worth having some mechanism for warning users if we haven't updated in a few days. I'm not sure of the security implications of stale nightly versions. Maybe it's overkill. | 13:16:36 |
