21 Oct 2024 |
pedrohlc ⚡️ | In reply to @svrana:matrix.org that's a kernel bug pedrohlc. I believe k900 patched upstream. not sure about the fix going in nixpkgs. but yeah, broke my tailscale setup. I can't find his PR though | 18:32:18 |
liberodark | If you want to see have update benchmark : https://gist.github.com/liberodark/54ba88cb82510ee4f9d0af9b1671fab7 | 18:32:23 |
liberodark | * If anyone want to see have update benchmark : https://gist.github.com/liberodark/54ba88cb82510ee4f9d0af9b1671fab7 | 18:32:33 |
svrana | think someone linked the upstream patch yesterday, but i haven't seen one in nixpkgs yet either.. i'm assuming we're waiting for the next kernel, but not sure. | 18:33:37 |
svrana | https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241019-xtables-typos-v2-1-6b8b1735dc8e@0upti.me/ | 18:34:58 |
| Edgar Robles joined the room. | 18:39:24 |
K900 | In reply to @svrana:matrix.org that's a kernel bug pedrohlc. I believe k900 patched upstream. not sure about the fix going in nixpkgs. but yeah, broke my tailscale setup. I submitted a patch but Pablo merged his version in the end | 18:47:58 |
K900 | So it should hopefully be in the next stable kernels unless the stable machine breaks again | 18:48:12 |
| ReecerTV joined the room. | 18:54:41 |
| ReecerTV set a profile picture. | 18:59:17 |
liv <3 | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org e.g. liv.laptop.enable = lib.mkEnableOption … I have the following now, but rebuilding my system gives the following error: error: The option liv' does not exist. Definition values:`, how can I enable that? | 19:11:44 |
liv <3 | Download clipboard.png | 19:11:47 |
liv <3 | * I have the following now, but rebuilding my system gives the following error: error: The option 'liv' does not exist. Definition values: , how can I enable that? | 19:12:02 |
emily | that doesn't do what you think it does | 19:14:34 |
emily | the cfg in the let is not the cfg in the body, the latter is just an identifier. let x = 123; in { x = 456; } is { x = 456; } | 19:14:59 |
emily | also, you use options.* to declare options and config.* to read their values | 19:15:11 |
liv <3 | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org the cfg in the let is not the cfg in the body, the latter is just an identifier. let x = 123; in { x = 456; } is { x = 456; } ah okay | 19:24:04 |
liv <3 | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org also, you use options.* to declare options and config.* to read their values okay, changed that | 19:24:22 |
liv <3 | This is correct, right? | 19:25:34 |
liv <3 | Download clipboard.png | 19:25:36 |
liv <3 | since it still outputs the same error :p | 19:25:42 |
liv <3 | * this is correct, right? | 19:25:46 |
emily | looks more correct, maybe you're defining it elsewhere or something | 19:27:18 |
| mattes l joined the room. | 19:32:52 |
mattes l | hi everyone, i am not quite sure whether this is the right place to ask, but here it goes: ive been using "basic" nixos for a bitnow, meaning without flakes or overlays home-manager etc, and have recently begun constructing my own flake. , which i based on nmasur's (would have submitted an issue at his repo, but i have changed added and removed a lot around the flake). however, the configuration is not building correctly and i for the life of me am not able to figure out why. it seems like most if not all binaries are installed, yet the .config is not populating, which makes me think this might be an error in my home-manager setup. so, if anyone has a few mins to spend on helping me figure this out by checking out my repo: github.com/veri-tty/flake i'd really appreciate it :) | 19:40:31 |
mattes l | did my message get deleted or was it an error on my side? | 19:41:32 |
liv <3 | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org looks more correct, maybe you're defining it elsewhere or something that was the case, i removed that, trying again now | 19:54:29 |
liv <3 | i feel like i want to become a farmer and stop using technology sometimes | 19:57:32 |
| (artur 'manuel) changed their display name from (lambda (f l) (format nil "~a ~a")) "Artur" "Manuel" to (artur 'manuel). | 20:04:13 |
liv <3 | I should call this with config.laptop.enable = true; right? I think that at https://discourse.nixos.org/t/whats-wrong-etc-nixos-configuration-nix-has-an-unsupported-attribute-boot/22899/3 they mean that it should be the other way around, so I tried both but both won't work. Attached is my host's default.nix file. | 20:15:08 |