Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
26 Jan 2022 | ||
[zhaofengli/colmena] JCapucho closed issue #50: Nixpkgs fails to build on unstable | 09:37:44 | |
09:43:16 | ||
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deWilli Butz: ^ | 09:47:12 | |
In reply to @zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liI did the exact same thing. I'll check the fix later today | 10:11:44 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli reopened issue #50: Nixpkgs fails to build on unstable | 14:51:41 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli pinned issue #50: Nixpkgs fails to build on unstable | 15:00:27 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli published v0.2.1: v0.2.1 - Fix sandboxed documentation build on unstable | 15:24:29 | |
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de I thought more about it, and don't think it's a good idea since the deployment options are version-specific and Colmena depends on the structure to deserialize it correctly. Colmena should be self-contained, and confusing errors can easily occur if we allow people to "bring their own deployment options" which is required if you want to pass in an evaluated config directly. Exposing the deployment option module for external use is fine, but Colmena should use its own when it's the one running the deployment. | 17:25:17 | |
In reply to @zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liFair enough. I managed to hammer the proverbial square peg into the round hole by setting config.system.build = lib.mkForce ...; but that's really not the direction I want to go in :D I think I'll try and represent my use case with colmena's code then, but not with a view to upstreaming it | 17:46:15 | |
In reply to @willi:butz.cloud I verified that it's fixed on v0.2.1. had to comment out buildOnTarget though :> | 18:41:44 | |
In reply to @willi:butz.cloudGreat, thanks for testing! | 18:42:41 | |
Thanks for colmena! 🎉 | 18:44:55 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli unpinned issue #11: Flake support | 18:47:03 | |
22:27:14 | ||
27 Jan 2022 | ||
Hi, I'm looking to migrate my nixosConfigurations flake output to colmena node output | 11:14:42 | |
Main concern is colmena node don't understanding modules list | 12:33:02 | |
Jane Jasperous: You can just use imports. e.g.
| 12:48:52 | |
* Jane Jasperous: You can just use imports. e.g.
| 12:49:01 | |
* Jane Jasperous: You can just use imports. e.g.
| 12:49:12 | |
just was trying changin modules by imports. But then nixosSystem fails because modules is mandatory attribute | 12:52:06 | |
but i can get ride of nixosConfigurations actually | 12:53:24 | |
I am sorry, I am not sure I if understand your question correctly, could you rephrase it? | 15:01:52 | |
I was trying to achieve build .#colmena.$host and .#nixosConfiguration.$host using exactly same definition. But colmena doesnt like "modules" option. If i change "modules" by "imports" the colmena is ok, but nixos-rebuild sak for "modules" definition. | 15:31:32 | |
* I was trying to achieve build .#colmena.$host and .#nixosConfiguration.$host using exactly same definition. But colmena doesnt like "modules" option. If i change "modules" by "imports" then colmena is ok, but nixos-rebuild ask for "modules" definition. | 15:31:57 | |
Finally, after try some deployments using colmena Im happy enough to get rid of nixosConfigurations output :) | 15:33:05 | |
Jane Jasperous:
(if you get an error that deployment options are undefined, import colmena.nixosModules.deploymentOptions in your nixosConfiguration) | 17:38:03 | |
28 Jan 2022 | ||
[zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli opened
pull request
#51: eval.nix: Add "${name}-key.service" units for keys
| 02:55:16 | |
15:59:39 | ||
🎉 | 16:00:12 | |
31 Jan 2022 | ||
[zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli closed issue #50: Nixpkgs fails to build on unstable | 19:34:49 |