| 27 Sep 2022 |
@rendakuenthusiast:imperishable.name | I tried doing the trick of wiping out the sha256, but it just said that the hash of the previously-downloaded version was what the hash had to be | 00:59:16 |
@rendakuenthusiast:imperishable.name | not the new version I uploaded | 00:59:21 |
@rendakuenthusiast:imperishable.name | so it's not fetching the new version | 00:59:28 |
Zhaofeng Li | In reply to @rendakuenthusiast:imperishable.name I tried doing the trick of wiping out the sha256, but it just said that the hash of the previously-downloaded version was what the hash had to be If you set sha256 to all zeroes (or lib.fakeSha256) does it force a refetch? | 01:00:20 |
@rendakuenthusiast:imperishable.name | Zhaofeng Li: that's what i tried, it doesn't force a refresh, it says that it expects the same sha256 that was there before corresponding to the outdated version of the file | 03:50:27 |
| @palo:xaos.space changed their profile picture. | 07:29:30 |
| @palo:xaos.space changed their profile picture. | 07:31:44 |
| @palo:xaos.space changed their profile picture. | 07:35:09 |
| @skamdart:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:40:02 |
| 30 Sep 2022 |
| yaya joined the room. | 12:26:01 |
| @lara:uwu.is left the room. | 12:36:09 |
| /madonius[er|he] joined the room. | 21:11:36 |
| 1 Oct 2022 |
@garionion:entr0py.de | hey, i want to convert my previous nixops config to a flake using colmena. however, as we have some shared config and custompackages in our infrastructure, i included the shared git repo as git submodule. however, when i want to deploy/update the servers with colmena, it does not find the file with the overlay config. my flake.nix looks like this: https://dev.paste42.de/FIPsp7Iu2e1OjV7V0RgWY89oZQ431zfZ | 18:17:29 |
@garionion:entr0py.de | (everything under ./fem is the submodule | 18:17:49 |
@garionion:entr0py.de | * (everything under ./fem is the submodule) | 18:17:53 |
Zhaofeng Li | Sadly flakes don't support (*) submodules at the moment. As a workaround, you can add the fem submodule as a flake input.
(*) Actually the water is muddier but this is the simplest description of the situation at the moment.
| 20:22:10 |
| 2 Oct 2022 |
| Daniel joined the room. | 00:48:54 |
@garionion:entr0py.de | In reply to @zhaofeng:zhaofeng.li
Sadly flakes don't support (*) submodules at the moment. As a workaround, you can add the fem submodule as a flake input.
(*) Actually the water is muddier but this is the simplest description of the situation at the moment.
But I would have to add a flake.nix to fem right? Or can I just use a plain git repo as a input? | 09:35:38 |
@garionion:entr0py.de | * But I would have to add a flake.nix to `fem` right? Or can I just use a plain git repo as an input? | 09:35:46 |