| 11 Jul 2022 |
CRTified | But I don't know whether the terraform json output should be tracked by git 🤔 | 11:16:49 |
CRTified | * But I don't know whether the terraform json output should be tracked by git 🤔 (to make it pure) | 11:16:57 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | it shouldn't | 11:16:58 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | see, with the same Terraform declarations I can run terraform apply or terraform destroy | 11:17:26 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | So let's say:
- apply. HostA IP = 1.1.1.1
- destroy
- apply. HostA IP = 1.1.1.2
| 11:18:05 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | that's why Terraform keeps the state outside git (and for other reasons), and why this can't be pure to be usable | 11:18:28 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | Well, I could git-commit the terraform output anyway 😆 | 11:18:40 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | But direct linking to terraform state seems more useful imho (I might be wrong) | 11:19:04 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | well... just like I was expecting, it doesn't work. 😕 In my flake, I have:
let inventory = builtins.fromJSON (
builtins.readFile
(
pkgs.runCommandLocal "terraform-inventory" {
src = ./.;
} ''
export PATH=${self.outputs.devShells.${pkgs.system}.default}/bin:$PATH
bash $src/ansible/inventories/terraform.sh > $out
''
)
);
in colmena = { ... } # Stuff that parses the inventory and generates machine info
The results, as I was expecting:
> colmena build
warning: Git tree '/var/home/yajo/prodevel/moduground' is dirty
[INFO ] Using flake: git+file:///var/home/yajo/prodevel/moduground
[INFO ] Enumerating nodes...
warning: Git tree '/var/home/yajo/prodevel/moduground' is dirty
building '/nix/store/pa4n1x0ncgw669zyksz89kwflpr51nl8-terraform-inventory.drv'...
â•·
│ Error: Backend initialization required, please run "terraform init"
│
│ Reason: Initial configuration of the requested backend "http"
[...]
Basically it means that it's trying to build that inventory as a normal derivation, in isolation. Thus, it doesn't get the necessary environmental secrets that Terraform uses to access its state, and fails.
The dynamic inventory should be evaluated outside of the nix expression, and maybe passed in as an argument. But my guess is that this would be common enough so as to colmena needing to add support for it out of the box somehow, right?
| 12:34:06 |
Buckley | So wait, is there a pure evaluation mode? | 13:54:48 |
Buckley | That sounds nice | 13:55:02 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | not for colmena AFAIK | 13:55:18 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | I'm using flakes, that's pure by default AFAIK | 13:56:59 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | not with colmena | 13:57:10 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | colmena isn't currently able to evaluate purely | 13:57:26 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | https://github.com/zhaofengli/colmena/blob/ac8852dcdf7ab6e9524600518414a63dbfb115b1/src/nix/evaluator/nix_eval_jobs.rs#L85 | 13:57:55 |
@jairo:recallstack.icu | But then how to get json output from one script into it as an argument? 🤔 | 14:01:07 |
| 14 Jul 2022 |
| tylerjl joined the room. | 21:26:34 |
tylerjl | Hey hey - is there a good way to consume a nixosConfiguration from something like a flake output to feed into colmena? I'd love to pull a host's config out of something like my flake that uses digga/devos and feed it into colmena to apply to the host | 21:29:38 |
Buckley | my config used to do that | 22:29:55 |
Buckley | looking through code history for the exact way... | 22:30:59 |
CRTified | I've written my method in an gh issue, one moment | 22:31:51 |
Buckley | https://github.com/buckley310/nixos-config/blob/95f13eadfaae9a48c9e2cd4323417ba0eab36625/lib/deploy.nix#L96-L105 | 22:32:13 |
CRTified | https://github.com/zhaofengli/colmena/issues/60#issuecomment-1047199551 here's mine | 22:32:47 |
Buckley | yeah, his imports colmena and adds the module to the machines. i have my own little shim thing (sconfig.deployment) instead. pick your poison :D | 22:33:52 |
tylerjl | Ah, those are both great and should get me to where I need, I really appreciate it | 22:34:50 |
Buckley | at some point i stopped doing this as a performance optimization. by building the machine in the flake as nixosConfiguration, then feeding it to colmena to build it again, theres some overhead | 22:35:13 |
Buckley | its not much if you just have a couple machines | 22:35:32 |
tylerjl | Yeah, this is all personal infra / should be < 30 hosts at max | 22:35:52 |
tylerjl | nixosSystem is sort of a new one to me, is that significantly different than a flake nixosConfiguration? | 22:36:12 |