| 19 Feb 2025 |
 pcarrier | options = {
roles = mkOption {
type = types.attrsOf types.bool;
default = {
bastion = false;
spawner = false;
etcd = false;
webserver = false;
};
};
};
| 20:20:05 |
| pcarrier | that's OK, I'll switch to a single role per box | 20:22:35 |
| pcarrier | perfect :) | 20:37:06 |
| pcarrier | Redacted or Malformed Event | 20:43:00 |
| pcarrier | * I'm trying to make nix run .#deploy args... run the colmena version as imported, can't find how to access the binary to put in a pkgs.writeShellScriptBin though | 20:43:20 |
 gmacon | Ah; the assignment overrides the default value instead of being merged with it, you need types.submodule with each role having its own default to do that. | 20:48:17 |
 kevinpthorne | From the cheap seats: Why not use an array of enum type? The kubernetes pkgs does it and makes it clean to check
Roles = [ “bastion” “etc” ]; for example | 20:50:11 |
| pcarrier | maybe I should ask for what I'm actually after: how can I run colmena unstable? | 20:56:44 |
| pcarrier | * maybe I should ask for what I'm actually after: how can I run colmena unstable, ideally through instructions in my flake? | 21:02:01 |
| pcarrier | * maybe I should ask for what I'm actually after: how can I run colmena unstable, ideally through instructions in my flake? (I was hoping to expose a wrapper à la nix run .#c) | 21:02:23 |
| pcarrier |
deployTool = pkgs.writeShellScriptBin "deployTool" ''
${colmena.packages.${system}.colmena}/bin/colmena "$@"
'';
fails with:
| 21:08:47 |
| pcarrier | * deployTool = pkgs.writeShellScriptBin "deployTool" ''
${colmena.packages.${system}.colmena}/bin/colmena "$@"
'';
fails with:
error: builder for '/nix/store/h8hz7zb1vllgws7sw9fbhm1cjpbrmpww-nix-eval-jobs-2.14.0-colmena.drv' failed with exit code 1;
last 8 log lines:
> unpacking sources
> unpacking source archive /nix/store/wj7x28pyf2230189fw788mm31z8zmzm3-source
> source root is source
> patching sources
> applying patch /nix/store/v5farz7ph5afn6hw2hi0r343lhhpv8dd-nix-eval-jobs-stable.patch
> patching file src/nix-eval-jobs.cc
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 342.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/nix-eval-jobs.cc.rej
For full logs, run:
nix-store -l /nix/store/h8hz7zb1vllgws7sw9fbhm1cjpbrmpww-nix-eval-jobs-2.14.0-colmena.drv
| 21:09:14 |
| 20 Feb 2025 |
| gmacon | This looks like the correct approach to me, but it seems that the build is broken with the versions you have pinned. Maybe nix flake update? | 13:44:38 |
| 24 Feb 2025 |
|  Saturn changed their profile picture. | 22:37:07 |
| 25 Feb 2025 |
|  @sumner:nevarro.space left the room. | 15:11:53 |
| 26 Feb 2025 |
| pcarrier | Is it normal for node enumeration to take tens of seconds and evaluations to take ~3 mins for about 10 nodes? | 19:25:36 |
| pcarrier | * Is it normal for node enumeration to take tens of seconds and evaluations to take ~3 mins for about 10 nodes? running unstable from a few days ago | 19:26:06 |
| pcarrier | * how can I run colmena unstable, ideally through instructions in my flake? (I was hoping to expose a wrapper à la nix run .#c) | 19:26:31 |
| pcarrier | * Is it normal for node enumeration to take tens of seconds for less than 30 nodes and for evaluations to take ~3 mins for about 10 nodes? running unstable from a few days ago | 19:26:57 |
| pcarrier | * Is it normal for node enumeration to take tens of seconds for less than 30 nodes and for evaluations to take ~3 mins for about 10 nodes? most builds+deploys are really fast in comparison. running unstable from a few days ago. | 19:27:18 |
| gmacon | I've found that the heuristic for --node-eval-limit is too optimistic and so my machine swaps like crazy during evaluation if I forget to lower it. With a reasonable value, I see about 30s eval time for 10 nodes. | 19:40:17 |
| pcarrier | no swapping AFAICT (I do have 96GB of RAM) | 19:41:43 |
| gmacon | well, then... if you only have 30 nodes, that's no problem (the heuristic limit will be 190) | 20:29:00 |
| 27 Feb 2025 |
|  Unit 1721344 [polygon] (it/its, es/ihr) changed their profile picture. | 08:24:02 |
| Unit 1721344 [polygon] (it/its, es/ihr) changed their display name from Unit 1721344 [polygon] (it/she) to Unit 1721344 [polygon] (it/its, es/ihr). | 22:21:08 |
| 3 Mar 2025 |
|  recoup3948 joined the room. | 16:03:11 |
| 4 Mar 2025 |
|  Valodim joined the room. | 20:23:22 |
| 5 Mar 2025 |
|  rntpts joined the room. | 23:02:45 |
| 7 Mar 2025 |
|  Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad to qyriad. | 16:02:56 |
| 8 Mar 2025 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from qyriad to Qyriad. | 21:41:03 |
