Colmena | 338 Members | |
| A simple, stateless NixOS deployment tool - https://github.com/zhaofengli/colmena | 115 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Feb 2022 | ||
eval-config has an additional parameter extraModules https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/a0ad8dcd354c67f084511e4ae78a27af83df95fd/nixos/lib/eval-config.nix#L28 - That allows you to add your usual modules to modules, and colmena.nixosModules.deploymentOptions to extraModules | 20:48:45 | |
| So in general it looks like this for me now:
| 20:49:46 | |
| i think my ideal scenario would be for nixosConfigurations to import the colmena module explicitly, and then nxiosConfigurations to be read directly by colmena... though i do not claim this to be an easy lift :D | 20:51:41 | |
| ive poked around the codebase a bit in hopes of writing some PRs but i just haven't put enough time into the rust stuff to figure it out yet | 20:52:41 | |
In reply to @buckley310:matrix.orgYes, that would be the "best case", but I think I'm happy with my shim-method now 🙂 | 20:56:18 | |
| shims for days 😎 | 21:00:59 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] cole-h opened
issue
#54: Don't require meta.nixpkgs if meta.nodeNixpkgs is set for the target host(s)
| 23:48:40 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] cole-h opened
issue
#55: Move meta.nodeNixpkgs to deployment.nixpkgs inside the node config
| 23:56:28 | |
| [zhaofengli/colmena] cole-h edited issue #54: Don't require meta.nixpkgs if meta.nodeNixpkgs is set for the target host(s) | 23:56:56 | |
| 5 Feb 2022 | ||
| [zhaofengli/colmena] Repo forked into cole-h/colmena | 01:06:39 | |
[zhaofengli/colmena] cole-h drafted
pull request
#56: WIP: add deployment.nixpkgs option
| 01:08:13 | |
| [zhaofengli/colmena] cole-h commented on pull request #56: WIP: add deployment.nixpkgs option | 01:10:06 | |