| 1 Sep 2021 |
 Vladimír Čunát | * So this will put it back to work. (ah, probably not too much, just some NixOS tests will get added) | 21:38:43 |
| 3 Sep 2021 |
| Vladimír Čunát | In reply to @andi:kack.it
I'm currently testing the PR rebased on master (with a hydra jobset) so ideally the amount of (additional) rebuilds will be very small anyway. I don't expect the systemd jobset really helps to reduce the rebuilds much. It's small - only has about one thousand builds, but OfBorg says the full rebuild amount is >26k.
Also, I assume you didn't mean for systemd to go before the staging-next iteration that's been in progress for more than a week (?), and their combination will cause rebuilds again.
| 05:59:17 |
 andi- | It isn't about rebuilds but getting the testes executed. Also to be able to verify on local devices without days of rebuilding things locally. I don't expect it to merge apart from any of the usual staging flows. | 06:00:43 |
| andi- | * It isn't about rebuilds but getting the testes executed. Also to be able to verify on local devices without days of rebuilding things locally. I don't expect it to be merged outside of any of the usual staging flows. | 06:02:56 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Ah, so it just waits if there's more feedback and then will get merged to staging? Even staging-next would seem OK at this moment, given that you've tested it relatively a lot and it staging-next doesn't have that many binaries ATM (and x86_64-darwin is lagging way behind and won't suffer from systemd). | 06:04:48 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Ah, so it just waits if there's more feedback and then will get merged to staging? Even staging-next would seem OK at this moment, given that you've tested it relatively a lot and staging-next doesn't have that many binaries ATM (and x86_64-darwin is lagging way behind and won't suffer from systemd). | 06:05:18 |
| andi- | Yeah, I don't think it is very risky right now. There is one minor change pending and then it is good to go. I'll have a look at that in the evening. By then all the pending tests are hopefully through. | 06:07:21 |
| 4 Sep 2021 |
| andi- | FWIW I think the PR is "final". I've gone through most of the hydra build failures and I couldn't find anything that would come from my changes. Retargeted the PR to staging-next so we can merge it in whenever you want. | 16:33:46 |
| 5 Sep 2021 |
 hexa |
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/staging-next' by 485 commits.
| 12:52:07 |
|  lukegb (he/him) joined the room. | 12:52:29 |
| hexa | merged | 12:53:44 |
| hexa | ping me when python issues come up | 12:54:25 |
| lukegb (he/him) | ack | 12:54:34 |
| lukegb (he/him) | hmm, imagemagick bump in there too? | 12:54:40 |
| hexa | ah fuck | 12:55:10 |
| hexa | I forgot to rebase | 12:55:15 |
| hexa | brb | 12:55:17 |
| hexa | * ah fck | 12:57:10 |
| hexa | reverted, rebased, merged, pushed. | 13:03:16 |
| hexa | sorry :) | 13:03:18 |
| lukegb (he/him) | no worries :) thanks for the quick fix | 13:03:27 |
| hexa | please double-check | 13:03:46 |
| hexa | but it lgtm | 13:04:18 |
| lukegb (he/him) | hmm | 13:05:38 |
| lukegb (he/him) | we're missing charset-normalizer | 13:05:42 |
| hexa | that broke stuff. | 13:05:44 |
| hexa | picking it | 13:06:20 |
| hexa | so much confidence lost 🤐 | 13:06:53 |
| lukegb (he/him) | yeah, trying to pull together a mishmash of staging and python-unstable is going to be pain | 13:08:44 |
| hexa | indeed | 13:09:02 |
