| 19 Feb 2026 |
|  mana-byte changed their display name from Manaiki to mana-byte. | 16:36:27 |
 tom | late to the party but there's https://github.com/google/libphonenumber/pull/3903, should we vendor that instead? happy to make a PR | 17:50:00 |
| tom set a profile picture. | 20:44:23 |
| 20 Feb 2026 |
 Sandro 🐧 | yep, unmerged PRs should be vendored | 02:29:55 |
| tom | yup, I'm aware of that. My question was: Should we vendor that patch instead of pinning boost? | 07:11:43 |
 Alyssa Ross | sounds more friendly to cleanup. patches will be noticed when upgrading to a version that in includes it, but pins are rarely cleaned up | 08:46:50 |
| Alyssa Ross | as long as you're confident in the patch | 08:47:04 |
| tom | yeah, the patch is pretty straightforward and what boost recommends in their 1.89 release notes → opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492413 | 09:41:06 |
| 21 Feb 2026 |
 vcunat | I think of merging staging-next within hours. | 07:00:17 |
 K900 | Are we out of blockers then? | 08:24:17 |
| vcunat | -small is green now: https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1823052 | 08:31:52 |
| vcunat | mariadb.x86_64-darwin would block nixpkgs-unstable though | 08:32:13 |
| vcunat | (noticed since my last post) | 08:32:26 |
| vcunat | But it looks like just some missing includes. | 08:33:13 |
| vcunat | * But it looks like just some missing C #includes. | 08:33:33 |
| vcunat | * But it looks like just some missing C #include. | 08:33:35 |
 kirillrdy | tiny PR, non blocker, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492701 | 08:38:36 |
| vcunat | But it's not a staging* regression. Failing on nixpkgs master already:
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/322012946 | 08:58:46 |
| vcunat | Blaming bf4c79846d7c | 09:02:39 |
| vcunat | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/490780#issuecomment-3938484220 | 09:04:15 |
|  tazjin joined the room. | 10:04:50 |
| vcunat |
Are we out of blockers then?
I still see thousands of build regressions just on -linux:
https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1823053?filter=-linux&compare=unstable
| 10:21:50 |
| vcunat | I'm not aware of any blockers per se, but it's not a negligible amount. | 10:22:35 |
|  h7x4 changed their profile picture. | 19:25:17 |
| h7x4 changed their profile picture. | 19:30:10 |
| h7x4 changed their profile picture. | 19:33:34 |
| 22 Feb 2026 |
|  Delta joined the room. | 02:54:26 |
 mdaniels5757 | I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least couple of packages, and removes one reason that about 50 others fail (even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point? | 03:17:38 |
| mdaniels5757 | * I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least a couple of packages, and removes one reason that about 50 others fail (even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point? | 03:18:03 |
| mdaniels5757 | * I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least a couple of packages, and removes one reason that about 50 others fail (even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point in the cycle? | 03:18:20 |
