!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

366 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/116 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Apr 2026
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4104014:53:23
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)honestly a challenge to navigate xD14:53:37
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)foo.png
Download foo.png
14:55:08
@k900:0upti.meK900Well the good news is that you can just yoink that patch into your config14:55:40
@k900:0upti.meK900Without a world rebuild14:55:42
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)or revert to 26.0.4 since the patch does not apply cleanly15:01:35
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)Redacted or Malformed Event15:02:01
@k900:0upti.meK900You can also do that15:08:43
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)anyways not staging-related after all, just the mesa fix release15:08:57
@k900:0upti.meK900Maybe one day Mesa people will figure out how to run CTS before releasing15:09:35
@k900:0upti.meK900(it's genuinely a complicated problem, somehow)15:09:47
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Thorsøesome testsuite?15:11:49
@k900:0upti.meK900Multiple, technically15:13:04
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/khronosgroup/vk-gl-cts15:13:12
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil ThorsøeI guess it at least needs hw, if drivers are to be tested15:15:31
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Thorsøealways makes a bit harder15:15:39
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Thorsøenot insurmountable though15:15:47
@k900:0upti.meK900There's a whole bunch of issues really15:16:15
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátUh, the autoconf update is such a PITA for darwin.21:53:46
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátToo many packages break from getting autoreconf-ed with -std=gnu2321:54:04
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátMany packages just aren't ready for such new stuff.21:54:33
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI hate that C standard even does get changed by autoreconfig. It doesn't make sense. Only upstream should switch that.21:57:05
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* I hate that C standard even does get changed by autoreconf-ing. It doesn't make sense. Only upstream should switch that.21:57:23
19 Apr 2026
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossOnly upstream is supposed to run autoreconf06:16:08
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossThat's the design.06:16:11
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI know, but not everyone agrees with that. And sometimes you need to apply patches which may make it hard to avoid it.07:57:20
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossYep, and if we do that, we're opting into keeping up with autoconf changes and should be taking that into consideration.08:01:35
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossIt's also changed by new compiler versions by default, right? So even without autoconf it's not solely on upstream.08:05:44
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross What we can do is make sure every time we have to pin a C standard, we send that change upstream so going forward upstream will take responsibility for it 08:07:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátWe could. But that's even increasing the amount of work that we need to do.08:10:57

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6