| 19 Apr 2026 |
 leona | yes, it was a simple push: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/activity?ref=staging-nixos | 17:17:38 |
 tfc | ok that's better than changing the history with a force-push but still not great. thank you for confirming that the damage is limited | 17:18:36 |
 ma27 | fwiw everything staging should be catched by https://github.com/NixOS/org/blob/main/rulesets/nixpkgs/no-force-push.json#L17
so same rules as for all the other staging branches I believe?
revert will have to do someone else in here, currently in a train and thus limited in terms of things I can do. | 17:19:54 |
| 20 Apr 2026 |
 dramforever | do you still want this reverted? | 02:27:53 |
| dramforever | well, i think it's not that bad and you can just revert it as a first commit in your eventual pr | 03:06:05 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Well, if you were able to push that commit, you clearly have sufficient permissions to push a revert, too. | 04:56:15 |
 Alyssa Ross | K900 we're getting people coming from that issue fixing unrelated staging-next regressions now too! :D | 05:58:16 |
| tfc | unless the changes produce problems on hydra jobs i speak with some other maintainers if they find the changes controversial and revert if they don't like it. but the patch doesnt really contain controversial stuff. | 08:24:11 |
|  picnoir changed their display name from Picnoir to picnoir. | 10:07:01 |
 Gaétan Lepage | Hello!
Do you have a rough ETA for when staging-next will land?
Any remaining blockers? Something I can help with? | 16:13:00 |
| Alyssa Ross | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/511329 is the main issue at the moment. | 16:35:30 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Thanks! I'll keep track of that | 16:38:32 |
| ma27 | honestly, I don't think it's reasonable to have accidentally pushed and then just accepted. since I do have one thing I'd like to discuss, I reverted for now (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/4c907dbb68ff92ec570bedfc53ad58d67862e48b) and re-opened a PR with the re-apply (and tfc's authorship in the commit rather than mine, ofc) : https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/511866 | 20:43:39 |
|  sky1e joined the room. | 23:35:20 |
| 21 Apr 2026 |
| dramforever | yes tbc i meant "if you still want it reverted" | 00:30:28 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Just a couple days, hopefully. | 06:01:12 |
|  BPub changed their profile picture. | 14:10:23 |
 eveeifyeve | Alyssa Ross: I can't find anything that is broken in staging-next for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/511329. Is all of the issues fixed? | 22:16:20 |
| eveeifyeve | Oh nvm your link linked me to the wrong nix-review problematic deps. | 22:18:56 |
| 22 Apr 2026 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I think we can merge staging-next today. There certainly are some leftover regressions, but not that many in total and I've noticed nothing critical. (saw gimp2, lomiri, qt6Packages.qtwebengine on darwin, appstream and others) | 06:55:04 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Except... does anyone understand this failure? https://hydra.nixos.org/build/326761030 | 07:13:07 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It reproduces on Hydra, but I did not reproduce it in a local release-checks build. | 07:13:29 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Apparently it regressed during the past two days. | 07:14:32 |
 K900 | It's too late for a Pipewire bump, isn't it | 09:22:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát | We have basically all binaries now. | 09:49:57 |
| K900 | Yeah | 09:51:15 |
| K900 | It's not horribly critical at least | 09:51:41 |
| K900 | OK, to staging it goes | 10:01:47 |
 emily | @reckenrode:matrix.org | 11:01:04 |
 Randy Eckenrode | I will have a very brief time this morning to look at it and then lunch. This is my no-rebuild hack. How did it pass the eval check if it now fails to eval? | 11:06:39 |
