| 9 Feb 2026 |
 whispers [& it/fae] | ah, okay, i assumed they were only retried if the drv changed | 22:42:23 |
| whispers [& it/fae] | * | 22:53:06 |
 hexa | There is a restart all failed button | 23:22:18 |
| 10 Feb 2026 |
 Lun | libsForQt5.kconfig is failing with a cycle between bin and out, I think something up with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/481986 but too busy to look at much right now | 04:43:48 |
| Lun | * libsForQt5.kconfig in staging-next is failing with a cycle between bin and out, I think something up with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/481986 but too busy to look at much right now | 04:44:04 |
|  pneumatic changed their display name from ribosomerocker to pneumatic. | 10:28:44 |
| 11 Feb 2026 |
 K900 | coreutils-i686 OOMs in tests on next | 19:39:26 |
| K900 | That's exciting | 19:39:30 |
 vcunat | You mean, it fills the 32-bit space? | 19:40:12 |
| vcunat | We lost the 32-bit firefox build years ago to that issue. | 19:40:28 |
| K900 | Not entirely sure what exactly it does | 19:41:53 |
| K900 | Have not looked super closely | 19:41:59 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | multilib stdenv when? | 21:28:38 |
| 12 Feb 2026 |
 Tristan Ross | I tried reviewing a PR targeting staging and got this:
error: Cannot build '/nix/store/25szfqz836lmypkvmrwa22zsn4xqf3wq-expand-response-params.drv'.
Reason: builder failed with exit code 1.
Output paths:
/nix/store/hd0k8s0c341wxg041g78jhggsic6s1ws-expand-response-params
Last 9 log lines:
> Running phase: unpackPhase
> Running phase: patchPhase
> Running phase: updateAutotoolsGnuConfigScriptsPhase
> Running phase: configurePhase
> no configure script, doing nothing
> Running phase: buildPhase
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-fstrict-flex-arrays=1'
> /nix/store/9l34ijwa4q1wp0nnjbmnnrvgm8cgkn8v-bootstrap-stage1-stdenv-linux/setup: line 1824: pop_var_context: head of shell_variables not a function context
> /nix/store/shkw4qm9qcw5sc5n1k5jznc83ny02r39-default-builder.sh: line 1: pop_var_context: head of shell_variables not a function context
For full logs, run:
nix log /nix/store/25szfqz836lmypkvmrwa22zsn4xqf3wq-expand-response-params.drv
| 04:32:40 |
| Tristan Ross | Seems like https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/473648 is the culprit | 04:34:58 |
 dramforever | minimal bootstrap gcc too old for -fsfa=1? | 04:37:53 |
| Tristan Ross | Possibly | 04:38:42 |
| Tristan Ross | Idk | 04:38:45 |
| dramforever | wait what | 04:38:52 |
| Tristan Ross | I thought aarch64-linux doesn't have minimal bootstrap | 04:39:04 |
| dramforever | it's there since 13 | 04:39:09 |
| Tristan Ross | Wtf, why is it broken then? | 04:39:57 |
| dramforever | oh watit nevermind didn't see aarch64-linux, let me take a look | 04:40:38 |
| Tristan Ross | For now, I'm just going to disable that hardening option. | 04:40:59 |
| dramforever | yeah pkgs/stdenv/linux/bootstrap-files/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu.nix is still on 12 | 04:41:11 |
| dramforever | how hard is it to bump that | 04:41:19 |
| Tristan Ross | Idk | 04:41:23 |
| Tristan Ross | But it would be good to not have a broken aarch64-linux stdenv | 04:41:36 |
| Tristan Ross | I got hello built with just disabling the hardening option. I'll work on bumping it over to GCC 13 | 04:42:03 |
| Tristan Ross | Ideally, we should update the bootstrap a bit more frequently. It looks like the bootstrap for aarch64-linux is quite old. | 04:49:59 |
