!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

355 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/116 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
20 Jan 2026
@eveeifyeve:matrix.orgeveeifyeveDoes anyone know why nixpkgs-review takes a long time to eval using github eval. before it starts actually doing the work?03:44:54
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián HerediaI don't feel it takes a long time, probably close to the network requirement of a couple do en MBs of data being transfered.03:54:17
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Heredia* I don't feel it takes a long time, probably close to the network requirement of a couple of MBs of data being transfered.03:54:28
@lt1379:matrix.orgLunIf you accidentally try to kick off a 50k package rebuild it can oom/hang forever at that stage iirc04:00:35
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She] GHA has slow CPUs and low RAM 04:00:49
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]if you're talking about nixpkgs-review-gha04:01:00
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]if not, then its just taking a while04:01:08
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]it is what it is04:01:13
@k900:0upti.meK900 @emily have we forgot about time64 by default? 09:26:20
@k900:0upti.meK900I lost track09:26:29

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6