!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

342 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/112 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
30 Dec 2025
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat *

I'm not sure about staging-next. While I'm not aware of any particular blockers, the amount of regressions does remain pretty high.

One way to look is https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1821537?compare=unstable
i.e. 4.3k jobs newly failing - 1.1k newly succeeding. If we wanted to take into account the rotation of non-default python version (which appear as new and removed packages in there), we could look at total successes and failures.

Successes decrease by 17k (!) and failures increase by 7k.

07:55:51
@k900:0upti.meK900I see a lot of potentially flaky stuff in the reports07:59:53
@k900:0upti.meK900twisted uvloop etc07:59:56
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatThey've been retried a few times already.08:00:37
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)didn't hexa disable tests on uvloop darwin?08:00:54
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatIf they're that much flaky, I consider them as good as always failing.08:00:56
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)but anyways, i vote to fix channel blockers only and other than that figure it out on master08:01:20
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaOn 3.1408:01:42
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunaton x86_64-darwin only, right?08:02:24
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaBoth08:02:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatOh.08:02:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatThis one is 3.13 on aarch64-darwin: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/31751638408:02:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaTwisted, not uvloop, aorry08:03:20
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaCouldn't repro twisted locally08:03:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* uvloop, not twisted, aorry09:19:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6