| 15 Sep 2025 |
 emily | if so pls let me do it unless it's urgent | 13:48:46 |
| emily | can do in a few hours | 13:48:52 |
 K900 | I'll try to run it | 13:50:23 |
| K900 | @emily | 13:53:13 |
| K900 | 
Download image.png | 13:53:13 |
| emily | welp | 13:54:29 |
| emily | I guess nobody touched LLVM | 13:54:34 |
| emily | cheers | 13:54:36 |
 hexa | https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1034 | 15:07:13 |
| hexa | anyone fancy another round of xml parser changes for staging? | 15:07:29 |
| hexa | release is pending https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/issues/1030 | 15:07:53 |
 connor (he/him) (UTC-7) | For staging rebuilds, how much time would you all say is spent waiting for x86_64-linux to churn through everything?
For instance, if the build capacity for the platform were tripled or done on much larger machines, what would that mean for iteration? | 15:54:15 |
| emily | it would mean very little, since it's not the bottleneck | 15:54:46 |
| emily | more/beefier Macs would probably help, though even there the queue runner is preventing full utilization I believe | 15:55:13 |
| emily | switching off x86_64-darwin in a few months will help | 15:55:24 |
| connor (he/him) (UTC-7) | Any idea if there are plans to promote aarch64-darwin to a higher tier of support? | 15:56:26 |
| emily | it is de facto pretty high tier | 15:57:54 |
| emily | blocks nixpkgs-unstable etc. | 15:58:03 |
| emily | aarch64-linux is nominally more blocking and also easier to support, but probably has significantly fewer users | 15:58:35 |
| emily | if you mean the list of tier assignments in the RFC, that's explicitly listed as only being an informative guide at the time of writing rather than a fixed reality | 15:58:59 |
| emily | but I would also say that the tiers RFC was never really fully implemented | 15:59:13 |
| emily | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#chap-platform-support continues to be the most accurate guide to platform support :) | 15:59:37 |
| K900 | @emily are we actually ready on GCC 15? | 16:51:14 |
| emily | I mean, nnno | 16:51:38 |
| emily | probably we never will be though | 16:51:40 |
| emily | I was going to do some builds but if we're looking at next two days probably next cycle is the play | 16:51:54 |
| emily | I am CMake 4ing though | 16:52:52 |
| emily | FWIW https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/442977 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/443007 are CMake 4 and should be ready | 16:53:11 |
| emily | oh wait no TBB is LLVM 21 | 16:53:21 |
| emily | can't keep these things straight | 16:53:28 |
