!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

356 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/116 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
18 Jan 2026
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy Eckenrodehttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/481408 fixes it on staging-next.20:30:17
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátWhy not tag it as backport-release-25.11 directly?20:34:53
@isabel:isabelroses.comisabel changed their profile picture.20:43:58
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianHeya I'm super confused https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/475079 was opened on 29.12.2025 and merged on 10.01.2026 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/474788 was merged on 28.12.2025 the 258.3 bump still didn't land on 25.11 Did I miss the window by a few seconds?22:05:22
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianAt this rate , given that the next staging-next-25.11 iteration will take at least a week; it means it'll take ~5 weeks from merge to landing in a channel. That feels long. What could I have done differently to speed this up? Should I have proactively asked to include it in the previous staging-next cycle manually?22:15:48
@arianvp:matrix.orgArian* At this rate , given that the next staging-next-25.11 iteration will take at least a week; it means it'll take ~5 weeks from merge to landing in a channel. That feels way too long. What could I have done differently to speed this up? Should I have proactively asked to include it in the previous staging-next cycle manually?22:15:58
@hexa:lossy.networkhexamake sure we have more people fixing darwin problems22:26:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand prune nixpkgs22:26:59

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6