!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

316 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/107 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 Dec 2025
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)i have a couple more staging-next fails, will need to investigate10:14:28
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)add to that i686 ffmpeg10:14:38
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)* add to that i686 ffmpeg 810:14:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Someone had something for zug10:18:04
@k900:0upti.meK900I think10:18:07
@ghpzin:envs.netghpzinhttps://matrix.to/#/#staging:nixos.org/$7W3URCLoZF1-Ud-Q8kcoysdHRjs7rV_KQ2KCChw7YJI PR for zug was linked above: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/47245710:30:28
@ghpzin:envs.netghpzin https://matrix.to/#/#staging:nixos.org/$7W3URCLoZF1-Ud-Q8kcoysdHRjs7rV_KQ2KCChw7YJI
PR for zug was linked above: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472457
I think I had pgpdump fix for gcc15, will send soon.
10:31:54
@ghpzin:envs.netghpzin https://matrix.to/#/#staging:nixos.org/$7W3URCLoZF1-Ud-Q8kcoysdHRjs7rV_KQ2KCChw7YJI
PR for zug was linked above: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472457
I think I had `pgpdump` fix for gcc15, will send soon.
Never mind somebody already sent:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472562
10:32:39
@k900:0upti.meK900OK so mesoning xserver doesn't even look too bad10:50:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Also like half of the stuff that's still in the expression is just noops10:51:19
@k900:0upti.meK900And eyup it does just load gbm correctly imagine that10:52:23
@k900:0upti.meK900
 pkgs/by-name/xo/xorg-server/darwin/dri/GL/internal/dri_interface.h | 1409 -----------------------------------------------
 pkgs/by-name/xo/xorg-server/dont-create-logdir-during-build.patch  |   32 --
 pkgs/by-name/xo/xorg-server/package.nix                            |   96 +---
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1513 deletions(-)
10:53:27
@k900:0upti.meK900sob10:53:33
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)1500 deletions????10:53:52
@k900:0upti.meK900One of them is a giant vendored Mesa header10:54:01
@k900:0upti.meK900tbh10:54:02
@k900:0upti.meK900I need volunteers to test xorg-server11:02:19
@k900:0upti.meK900That don't involve me rebuilding musl from stdenv11:02:32
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) oh god musl on staging-next was BAD 11:02:37
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) i ran some musl builds on the gcc 15 branch and yikes 11:03:00
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh yeah you're also a musl enjoyer11:04:51
@k900:0upti.meK900Do you have xorgserver built at least?11:04:55
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)i am on an ancient version and i am currently building my big glibc system11:05:38
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) but if musl bootstrap tools and coreutils and gnumake is fixed already, i can poke a build of xorg server afterr 11:06:15
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) (the musl breaks were low this time) 11:06:25
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) * (the musl breaks were early this time) 11:06:36
@ghpzin:envs.netghpzin Fixed as in merged to staging-next ?
No, still fails on basename building stage2 xgcc, just checked.
11:12:28
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)yeah11:13:46
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)sounds about right11:13:51
@ghpzin:envs.netghpzin Fixed as in merged to staging-next ?
No, still fails on basename building stage2 xgcc, just checked.
Need somebody who understands musl to go through that whole cycle of fixes.
11:14:10

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6