| 13 Dec 2025 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | after that i'll look at the backlog, including that gcc thing if it wasn't merged before then | 10:05:30 |
 mdaniels5757 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/470523 | 19:28:53 |
| 14 Dec 2025 |
 9lore | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/470567 can someone tell me if this needs to go to staging or staging-nixos pls? | 00:12:38 |
| 9lore | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/470567 can someone tell me pls if this needs to go to staging or staging-nixos? | 00:12:53 |
 hexa | staging-nixos | 00:21:04 |
| 9lore | thx | 00:24:05 |
 Fabián Heredia | fyi, seems like hydra is unreachable at the moment. I'am getting 502 bad gateway errors | 00:47:30 |
| Fabián Heredia | * fyi, seems like hydra is unreachable at the moment. I'm getting 502 bad gateway errors | 00:47:36 |
| hexa | upsi dupsi | 00:47:40 |
| hexa | maintenance 🙂 | 00:47:42 |
|  suua joined the room. | 13:32:55 |
| 15 Dec 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | staging-next-25.11 will be merged today, probably. | 07:00:53 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * staging-next-25.11 will get merged today, probably. | 07:01:03 |
 K900 | Are we doing master next? | 07:05:12 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I had been thinking - because now is a rare opportunity when stable and unstable haven't diverged much in terms of rebuilds - that maybe we could first pick the contents of this staging-next-25.11 and merge that pretty quickly into nixpkgs master. Well, perhaps after checking that all of it really was intended for staging/master as well (relatively easy from cherry-pick marks). | 07:27:37 |
| Vladimír Čunát | But perhaps it's not worth the bother. The main advantage would be security fixes getting at least one week earlier than otherwise. Probably. | 07:28:11 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * I had been thinking - because now is a rare opportunity when stable and unstable haven't diverged much in terms of rebuilds - that maybe we could first pick the contents of this staging-next-25.11 into staging-next and merge that pretty quickly into nixpkgs master. Well, perhaps after checking that all of it really was intended for staging/master as well (relatively easy from cherry-pick marks). | 07:28:38 |
| Fabián Heredia | Wasn't there a staging-next cycle that wasn't part of 25.11 already performed? | 07:30:19 |
| Fabián Heredia | Ah no that's right the last staging-next cycle is part of 25.11 :O | 07:33:12 |
| Fabián Heredia | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/3dd12c46719c52e75d9f86998de15db82d27a6df | 07:33:14 |
| Fabián Heredia | git log origin/master..origin/staging --grep CVE
Only shows:
- gnutls (low and on 25.11)
- libpng 1.6.51 (highs and on 25.11)
- django_4 (moderate and on 25.11)
- libpng: 1.6.52 (highs and on 25.11)
- xkbcomp (moderates and on 25.11)
- libarchive (no CVEs and not on 25.11)
- glib (highs and not on 25.11)
| 07:42:00 |
| Vladimír Čunát | There was a 25.05 cycle, so perhaps that's what you mistaked for it. | 07:53:08 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * There was a 25.05 cycle, so perhaps that's what you mistook for it. | 07:53:22 |
| Fabián Heredia | yeah, just double checked and there hasn't been a staging-next cycle not part of 25.11 | 07:53:55 |
 Yureka (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470961 | 08:42:31 |
| Yureka (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470962 | 08:44:32 |
| Yureka (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470964 | 08:46:34 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | In reply to @yuka:yuka.dev
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470964 This one looks like an XML parser fail, but we didn't touch libxml2 this time, wtf???? | 08:48:50 |
| K900 | "fuzz" in the name | 08:49:05 |
| K900 | I wonder if they're actually fuzzing it | 08:49:09 |
