| 29 Jul 2021 |
hexa | wendy 🎉 | 13:46:44 |
FRidh | mass rebuild on master? | 14:17:10 |
FRidh | oh never mind, it's just because it's a different hydra project | 14:19:04 |
sterni | FRidh: looks like it to me? https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/trunk | 16:03:06 |
sterni | there's also no cache for current master, so seems like it | 16:03:21 |
sterni | oh hm seems to be in order mostly | 16:07:30 |
sterni | I screwed up with haskell-updates though since I missed the staging-next merge today | 16:10:50 |
sterni | so that's 20000 builds on master, maybe revert time? | 16:11:57 |
| 30 Jul 2021 |
FRidh | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org I screwed up with haskell-updates though since I missed the staging-next merge today haskell-updates were always merged directly into master. While in principle all larger rebuilds go via staging I can get there are reasons to send it to master though. | 06:25:19 |
sterni | In reply to @FRidh:matrix.org haskell-updates were always merged directly into master. While in principle all larger rebuilds go via staging I can get there are reasons to send it to master though. we have specifically updated our workflow to minimize the rebuilds by adding all relevant platforms to the haskell-updates jobset and making it a policy to merge master before merging and waiting for any rebuilds, so normally that shouldn't be an issue | 09:21:32 |
sterni | just forgot to check if there was anything significant on master between merging haskell-updates and the last merging in of master yesterday which was the screw-up | 09:21:59 |
sterni | but seems like the rebuilds finished over night, so not too bad | 09:22:20 |
Vladimír Čunát | Multiple mass-rebuild branches are difficult. I think it's historically the reason why the haskell jobset has such high priority on Hydra (very many scheduling shares). | 09:22:47 |
sterni | I can imagine it was struggling to get build shares with 5000-6000 jobs as it was back then | 09:29:35 |
sterni | nowadays a rebuild is like 20000 jobs since we build darwin and aarch64 as well | 09:29:53 |
| 10 Aug 2021 |
| happysalada joined the room. | 15:27:09 |
| chvp joined the room. | 15:33:58 |
| asbachb joined the room. | 15:50:40 |
| Jan Tojnar joined the room. | 17:57:00 |
| 11 Aug 2021 |
Sandro | FYI https://github.com/jonringer/nix-test-staging-next | 09:45:29 |
jonringer | Oh, i forgot I uploaded that | 15:18:12 |
| 14 Aug 2021 |
sterni | https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/20051 seems like this is the doctest issue | 11:35:29 |
Vladimír Čunát | When https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/133821 got open, I assumed these would get resolved by it. | 14:03:08 |
sterni | yes, GHC ticket suggests that, but haven't tested it myself so far | 14:12:31 |
Vladimír Čunát | I assume the author did test them
Ah, nice find! That fixes tracker (still building ghc and haskell packages), will open a PR
| 14:15:32 |
Vladimír Čunát | * I assume the author did test them
Ah, nice find! That fixes tracker (~still building ghc~ and haskell packages), will open a PR
| 14:16:01 |
Vladimír Čunát | * I assume the author did test them
Ah, nice find! That fixes tracker (~~still building ghc~~ and haskell packages), will open a PR
| 14:16:09 |
Vladimír Čunát | * I assume the author did test them
Ah, nice find! That fixes tracker (still building ghc and haskell packages), will open a PR
| 14:16:22 |
Vladimír Čunát | It's unfortunately rather expensive to verify it, at least without adding some overrides. | 14:17:35 |
jonringer | If people need to do expensive verifications, you can try my server https://github.com/jonringer/server-configuration | 19:21:16 |