| 16 Aug 2021 |
| tomberek joined the room. | 01:31:30 |
| 21 Aug 2021 |
| sterni changed their display name from sterni (he/him) to sterni[m]. | 22:21:29 |
| sterni changed their display name from sterni[m] to sterni. | 22:21:43 |
| 22 Aug 2021 |
| ggpeti joined the room. | 17:16:41 |
| 24 Aug 2021 |
hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/135569 | 14:52:45 |
hexa | somewhat large-ish with glibc bump | 14:53:16 |
Vladimír Čunát | Over 185k jobs in queue now. | 15:31:40 |
Vladimír Čunát | (I'll pause creating new feature jobsets.) | 15:32:22 |
sterni | does this sound good? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/135477#issuecomment-904451894 if so lmk and I'll rebase the PR | 20:32:33 |
Vladimír Čunát | I see nothing wrong about it, but it's not like I know this stuff. | 20:55:47 |
| 25 Aug 2021 |
| trofi joined the room. | 21:59:53 |
| trofi set a profile picture. | 22:19:15 |
| 26 Aug 2021 |
| trofi changed their display name from Sergei Trofimovich to trofi. | 07:41:02 |
| 28 Aug 2021 |
hexa | the openssl bump was reverted on master | 13:25:31 |
hexa | and the revert was reverted on staging-next | 13:25:39 |
hexa | while staging builds had been canceled | 13:26:01 |
hexa | verpbl wanted to wait until last nights eval of trunk has completed before reverting on master | 13:27:25 |
hexa | which was cancelled 🎉 | 15:01:27 |
Vladimír Čunát | ...and restarted by me now :-) Coordination can be hard. | 15:51:47 |
hexa | so very true 😀 | 16:07:52 |
| 30 Aug 2021 |
andi- | Is it possible to keep the scope of the next staging-next run smaller and include https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/131618 instead? It is already a comparatively big change (on the risk side) and I'd like to avoid having to debug binutils, glibc, ... issues if things go wrong while already debugging systemd. | 13:15:23 |
hexa | I don't mind, then we skip staging->staging-next once and you'd retarget on staging-next with base branch master | 13:17:10 |
hexa | * I don't mind, then we skip staging->staging-next once and you'd retarget on staging-next with base branch master. Also running v249 locally for 48h and didn't notice any obvious breakage 👍️ | 13:18:02 |
andi- | I'm currently testing the PR rebased on master (with a hydra jobset) so ideally the amount of (additional) rebuilds will be very small anyway. | 13:22:13 |
Vladimír Čunát | Maybe the systemd jobset should not have more shares than "trunk-combined"? | 14:44:11 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Maybe the systemd jobset should not have more build shares than "trunk-combined"? | 14:44:19 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Maybe the systemd jobset should not have (many times) more build shares than "trunk-combined"? | 14:44:26 |
Vladimír Čunát | I lowered them now. nixos-unstable is still waiting for the first bump with new openssl. | 15:09:36 |
Vladimír Čunát | (and I cancelled all but the latest builds in the systemd jobset) | 15:29:33 |
hexa | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org Maybe the systemd jobset should not have (many times) more build shares than "trunk-combined"? which is kinda funny, given the shares of the haskell-updaes job | 19:16:09 |