| 21 Oct 2025 |
 K900 | Because the webkit being pulled in is qtwebkit via qt5.full which they should not have used ANYWAY | 08:27:40 |
| K900 | But when I gave it qtbase it failed with a haskell type error anyway | 08:28:09 |
| K900 | So I'm going to just call it broken and move on | 08:28:18 |
| K900 | @Wolfgang Walther sniped again | 10:24:36 |
| K900 | I'll wait for the CUDA people to weigh in | 10:24:44 |
 Wolfgang Walther | :) | 10:25:03 |
| K900 | I bet they have some custom overlay or something that relies on this cursed behavior | 10:25:20 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | the bad webkitgtk was properly removed a few days ago, qt5 webkit needs to follow soon :P | 10:26:49 |
| K900 | qt5webkit has been marked insecure for ages now | 10:27:03 |
| K900 | It's probably yeetable tbh | 10:27:07 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | webkitgtk was marked insecure too due to libsoup2 | 10:27:23 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * webkitgtk_4_0 was marked insecure too due to libsoup2 | 10:27:33 |
| K900 | Honestly if you want to yeet it be my guest | 10:27:51 |
| K900 | I'm not sure we want to yeet qtwebengine5 yet but qtwebkit can go | 10:28:05 |
| K900 | Actually never mind it doesn't even rebuild those | 10:46:17 |
| K900 | I'll just merge and let CUDA people scream at me later if they want | 10:46:25 |
 hexa | was removed in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/450065 | 11:43:29 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i know, i approved that PR and would have merged that same day if jan didn't self-merge faster | 11:44:06 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * i know, i approved that PR and would have merged that same day if jan hadn't self-merged | 11:44:19 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | my point was, both was marked insecure, qtwebkit even for longer, so we should also remove both | 11:45:16 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | with the webkitgtk_4_0 the argument was backports of newer webkitgtk ABI during the 25.11 release cycle, but for qtwebkit there isn't any updates at all anymore. So it needs to go. | 11:46:07 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | If only we had a good deprecation/removal process... | 11:46:53 |
| K900 | For real though if anyone wants to yeet qtwebkit be my guest | 11:56:40 |
| K900 | The only reason I haven't done it yet is spoons | 11:56:46 |
 dramforever | workaround idea for the systemd static nodes thing, might be too cursed: just modprobe all the static nodes on boot | 12:22:21 |
| dramforever | wait this is technically not a staging matter anymore | 12:22:40 |
 emily | are there any channel blockers that need someone looking at them right now? | 23:58:08 |
| 22 Oct 2025 |
| emily | I see https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/454260 on the status page but not clear to me what it's waiting on | 00:16:37 |
 prince213 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/454422 | 02:32:56 |
| prince213 | Need some review on this CVE fix | 02:33:01 |
