| 19 Oct 2025 |
dramforever | and given the links this breaks real use cases kinda bad | 19:57:22 |
dramforever | * and given the links in the pr thread this breaks real use cases kinda bad | 19:57:32 |
ElvishJerricco | yea, I just don't think we can actually fix it, right? | 19:57:58 |
ElvishJerricco | like we can fix the test by doing something dumb, but I don't think we can actually fix the bug without a systemd patch | 20:00:28 |
dramforever | can we add a udev rule to fix this | 20:01:38 |
ElvishJerricco | no because these aren't devices in /sys, right? | 20:01:54 |
dramforever | oh, right, because static_node rules are basically magic | 20:02:43 |
ElvishJerricco | ok yea, confirmed, the PR that's in 258.1 fixes it | 20:12:05 |
ElvishJerricco | dramforever: do you agree that there's not a reasonable way to fix the underlying bug, other than to just update to 258.1? If so I'm just going to change the test to check a non-static dev node, like /dev/dri/card0, with a note to change it back after 258.1 | 20:13:07 |
dramforever | when do we expect 258.1 to land? it's the next staging-next right? | 20:29:19 |
dramforever | on the release schedule | 20:29:28 |
dramforever | well basically, what is this line? 2025-11-01 master (Day before ZHF) Merge staging-next into master, prepare for ZHF. Begin first staging-next cycle | 20:31:10 |
dramforever | is it the staging-next we're doing now? | 20:31:18 |
dramforever | or the next one? | 20:32:19 |
ElvishJerricco | yea | 20:34:39 |
ElvishJerricco | we can't get 258.1 in this cycle | 20:34:46 |
ElvishJerricco | so I'm going to open a PR to update to 258.1 on staging, probably today | 20:35:06 |
dramforever | i guess we'll just ship this regression for a few weeks | 20:38:05 |
ElvishJerricco | yea, kind of a bummer, but I don't really see anything we can do about it | 20:38:32 |
ElvishJerricco | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/453603 | 20:38:39 |
dramforever | if nobody beats me to it i'll come back after ~10h to test aarch64-linux | 20:42:41 |
dramforever | * if nobody beats me to it i'll come back after ~12h to test aarch64-linux | 20:43:03 |
ElvishJerricco | hm, the card0 workaround isn't working on aarch64 | 20:59:40 |
ElvishJerricco | huh, nothing is getting uaccess as far as I can tell in the aarch64 vm.... this is weird | 22:06:37 |
K900 | I wonder if this is something about legacy boot vs uefi | 22:13:27 |
K900 | Or like whatever it gets the console from | 22:13:35 |
ElvishJerricco | I don't see why either of those things would be relevant | 22:16:26 |
K900 | logind might not consider it an active session | 22:18:09 |
K900 | For whatever reason | 22:18:13 |
ElvishJerricco | well | 22:18:46 |