!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

318 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
19 Oct 2025
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverand given the links this breaks real use cases kinda bad19:57:22
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever* and given the links in the pr thread this breaks real use cases kinda bad19:57:32
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoyea, I just don't think we can actually fix it, right?19:57:58
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccolike we can fix the test by doing something dumb, but I don't think we can actually fix the bug without a systemd patch20:00:28
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforevercan we add a udev rule to fix this20:01:38
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco no because these aren't devices in /sys, right? 20:01:54
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveroh, right, because static_node rules are basically magic20:02:43
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccook yea, confirmed, the PR that's in 258.1 fixes it20:12:05
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco dramforever: do you agree that there's not a reasonable way to fix the underlying bug, other than to just update to 258.1? If so I'm just going to change the test to check a non-static dev node, like /dev/dri/card0, with a note to change it back after 258.1 20:13:07
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverwhen do we expect 258.1 to land? it's the next staging-next right?20:29:19
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveron the release schedule20:29:28
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever well basically, what is this line?
2025-11-01 master (Day before ZHF) Merge staging-next into master, prepare for ZHF. Begin first staging-next cycle
20:31:10
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveris it the staging-next we're doing now?20:31:18
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveror the next one?20:32:19
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoyea20:34:39
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccowe can't get 258.1 in this cycle20:34:46
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoso I'm going to open a PR to update to 258.1 on staging, probably today20:35:06
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveri guess we'll just ship this regression for a few weeks20:38:05
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoyea, kind of a bummer, but I don't really see anything we can do about it20:38:32
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/45360320:38:39
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverif nobody beats me to it i'll come back after ~10h to test aarch64-linux20:42:41
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever* if nobody beats me to it i'll come back after ~12h to test aarch64-linux20:43:03
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohm, the card0 workaround isn't working on aarch6420:59:40
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohuh, nothing is getting uaccess as far as I can tell in the aarch64 vm.... this is weird22:06:37
@k900:0upti.meK900 I wonder if this is something about legacy boot vs uefi 22:13:27
@k900:0upti.meK900 Or like whatever it gets the console from 22:13:35
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoI don't see why either of those things would be relevant22:16:26
@k900:0upti.meK900 logind might not consider it an active session 22:18:09
@k900:0upti.meK900 For whatever reason 22:18:13
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccowell22:18:46

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6