!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

319 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
12 Oct 2025
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)I like the idea16:25:30
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)So, spectrum really needs a fix for pkgsMusl.iproute2 in the current staging-next16:26:31
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her) *

anyways

So, spectrum really needs a fix for pkgsMusl.iproute2 in the current staging-next

16:26:39
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)it's expensive rebuilds-wise16:26:40
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)or we can make it conditional and then immediately revert and do a proper fix on staging yada yada16:27:02
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)this is the high rebuilds solution: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/45133816:27:11
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her) * or we can make it conditional and then immediately revert and do a proper fix on staging yada yada 16:27:29
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)someone merged it16:53:56
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)we can still revert and go the low rebuild count path16:54:18
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her) * 16:54:23
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her) * 16:54:39
@k900:0upti.meK900I've unmerged16:54:53
@k900:0upti.meK900It didn't get through the queue16:54:56
@k900:0upti.meK900We don't really want the 20k rebuilds at this point16:55:21
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)yep16:55:22
@ihar.hrachyshka:matrix.orgIhar Hrachyshkahow does one estimate when the next staging-next -> master will happen? (e.g. to determine if a temporary fix in master for a build failure is due while we wait for next->master to happen)16:59:54
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan joined the room.17:00:39
@k900:0upti.meK900Usually just ask here17:01:04
@k900:0upti.meK900I'd say we're looking at middle of next week17:01:22
@k900:0upti.meK900At the earliest17:01:25
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanDidn't know this room existed, I do now, sorry17:01:25
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan Yureka (she/her): Can't we merge that patch now that it is conditional on musl? 17:04:24
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanSorry I didn't spot that, I thought all the patches were conditional on musl even 17:04:34
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanLike you say it's more proper to apply the patch unconditionally, but I thought we always make it conditional17:05:54
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)that was the idea17:08:12
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/451386 but depends on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/45138517:08:18
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanI know what happened anyway, I had https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/451274 open and mistook the tags when I moved to the other tab 17:08:25
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her) we usually don't want patches to be conditional on something because the people doing the updates won't notice when patches no longer apply 17:08:36
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanI see yeah, just like the systemd example17:08:49
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(and because a patch conditional inherently can't be upstreamed)17:08:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6